Karen Soens v. Huddle House, Inc.
Decision date: January 9, 201410 pages
Summary
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's May 16, 2013 award with modification to add language regarding dependent eligibility under Schoemehl doctrine, finding that the employee's husband Russell Soens was a total dependent at the time of injury. The Commission determined that survivor compensation entitlements may extend to the identified dependent based on the claim's pendency during the relevant statutory period of January 9, 2007 to June 26, 2008.
Archive Notice
This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Legal Help
Practical guidance for this decision
Third-Party Injury Check
This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.
- A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
- The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
- A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.
Caption
FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION
(Modifying the Award of the Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 02-151850
Employee: Karen Soens
Employer: Huddle House, Inc. (Settled)
Insurer: Arrowpoint Capital (Settled)
f/k/a Security Insurance Company of Hartford
Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
This workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by $\S 287.480 RSMo. { }^{1}$ We find that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, except as modified herein. Pursuant to $\S 286.090$ RSMo, we issue this final award and decision affirming the May 16, 2013, award and decision of the administrative law judge, as modified herein. We adopt the findings, conclusions, decision, and award of the administrative law judge to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the findings, conclusions, decision, and modifications set forth below.
On or about December 16, 2013, the parties filed with this Commission a Stipulation for Modification of Award (Stipulation). By their Stipulation, the parties agree that this matter may be resolved if we modify the award to add the following language:
Dependency under Schoemehl:
Under Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, when an Employee is entitled to compensation and death ensues, compensation ceases when the Employee dies from a cause other than her work injury, "unless there are surviving dependents at the time of death." Section 287.230(2) RSMo.; Schoemehl v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri, 217 S.W.3d 900, (Mo. 2007). The word 'dependent' is defined to mean a relative by blood or marriage of a deceased Employee, who is actually dependent for support, in whole or in part, upon the Employee's wages at the time of the injury. Section 287.240(4) RSMo. "As such any "dependent" would have to be born and dependent at the time of the injury." Schoemehl, 217 S.W.3d at 902.
Recovery under Schoemehl is limited to claims that were pending between January 9, 2007 and June 26, 2008. The original claim in this matter was filed in 2003. Ms. Soens' claim was pending during the relevant period.
[^0]
[^0]: ${ }^{1}$ Statutory references are to the Revised Statutes of Missouri 2002, unless otherwise indicated.
Employee has been awarded permanent total disability benefits from the Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund. Therefore, although Employee in this case is still living, it is proper for this Commission to determine whether Employee had dependents at the time of the work injury to whom entitlement to that compensation may survive. Accordingly, we find that Russell Soens, the husband of Employee Karen Soens, was a total dependent of the Employee at the time of her work accident and injury and that Russell Soens has remained a total dependent of Employee since that time.
We accept the parties' Stipulation and we modify the award as set forth above. In all other respects, we affirm the award and decision of the administrative law judge.
We further approve and affirm the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Carl Strange, issued May 16, 2013, is attached and incorporated by this reference except to the extent modified herein.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 9^{\text {th }}$ day of January 2014.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
John J. Larsen, Jr., Chairman
James G. Avery, Jr., Member
Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member
Attest:
Secretary
FINAL AWARD
Employee: Karen Soens
Injury No. 02-151850
Dependents: N/A
Employer: Huddle House, Inc.
Additional Party: Second Injury Fund
Insurer: Arrowpoint Capital f/k/a Security Insurance Company of Hartford
Hearing Date: March 4, 2013
Checked by: CS/rf
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
- Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
- Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
- Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
- Date of accident or onset of occupational disease? September 22, 2002
- State location where accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Butler County, Missouri.
- Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
- Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
- Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
- Was claim for compensation filed within time required by law? Yes.
- Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
- Describe work employee was doing and how accident happened or occupational disease contracted: Employee tried to break up a dispute between customers and was injured.
- Did accident or occupational disease cause death? N/A
| Employee: Karen Soens | Injury No. 02-151850 |
- Parts of body injured by accident or occupational disease: See Findings.
- Nature and extent of any permanent disability: See Findings.
- Compensation paid to date for temporary total disability: 20,263.85.
- Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer-insurer: 90,759.45.
- Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer-insurer: N/A
- Employee's average weekly wage: 368.37.
- Weekly compensation rate: 245.58 for temporary total disability and permanent total disability; and $245.58 for permanent partial disability.
- Method wages computation: By agreement.
- Amount of compensation payable: a. Employee’s claim against the employer-insurer previously settled by compromise settlement agreement. b. Employee awarded permanent total disability benefits from Second Injury Fund at a rate of $245.58 per week beginning January 2, 2009 (see Findings).
- Second Injury Fund liability: Yes (see Findings).
- Future requirements awarded: N/A
Said payments shall be payable as provided in the findings of fact and rulings of law, and shall be subject to modification and review as provided by law.
The compensation awarded to the employee shall be subject to a lien in the amount of costs plus 25% of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the employee: Ronald Little.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW
On March 4, 2013, the employee, Karen Soens, appeared in person and by her attorney, Ronald Little, for a hearing for a final award. The Second Injury Fund was represented by Assistant Attorney General, Jonathan Lintner. At the time of the hearing, the parties agreed on certain undisputed facts and identified the issues that were in dispute. These undisputed facts and issues, together with the findings of fact and rulings of law, are set forth below as follows.
UNDISPUTED FACTS:
- On or about September 22, 2002, Huddle House, Inc. was operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act and its liability was insured by Arrowpoint Capital f/k/a Security Insurance Company of Hartford.
- On or about September 22, 2002, the employee was an employee of Huddle House, Inc. and was working under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act.
- On or about September 22, 2002, the employee sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment.
- The employer had notice of employee's accident.
- The employee's claim was filed within the time allowed by law.
- The employee's average weekly wage was $\ 368.37, her rate for temporary total disability and permanent total disability is $\ 245.58, and her rate for permanent partial disability is $\ 245.58.
- The employee's injury is medically causally related to the work injury occurring on or about September 22, 2002.
- The employer has furnished $\ 90,759.45 in medical aid to the employee.
- The employer has paid temporary total disability benefits for $824 / 7 weeks at a rate of \ 245.58 per week for a total of $\ 20,263.85.
- If permanent total disability is awarded to employee from the Second Injury Fund, the parties stipulate that the employee was lawfully married to Russell Soens on the $22^{\text {nd }}$ day of September 2002 and they have been continuously married since that date.
- If permanent total disability is awarded to employee from the Second Injury Fund, the parties stipulate that Russell Soens is a total dependent of the employee.
- The employee's disability from the September 22, 2002 work injury is 90 % permanent partial disability of the right upper extremity at the shoulder.
- The employee reached maximum medical improvement for the primary injury on December 30, 2004.
- Second Injury Fund liability for permanent total disability, if any, will begin on January 2, 2009 at a rate of 245.58 per week.
ISSUES:
- Nature and extent of disability.
- Liability of the Second Injury Fund.
EXHIBITS:
The following exhibits were offered and admitted into evidence:
Employee's Exhibits:
A. Deposition of Dr. Raymond Cohen;
B. Deposition of James England;
C. Medical Records of John J. Pershing VA Medical Center;
D. Medical Records of Orthopaedic Associates of Southeast Missouri;
E. Medical Records of Southeast Missouri Hospital;
F. Medical Records of Ozark Foothills Industrial/Ozark Physical Therapy;
G. Medical Records of Michael Milne, M.D.;
H. Medical Records of Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center;
I. Medical Records of L. J. Plunkett, M.D.;
J. Medical Records of Milton Eichmann, M.D.;
K. Medical Records of Tony Knox, M.D.;
L. Medical Records of Cape Neurological Associates;
M. Medical Records of St. Francis Medical Center;
N. Medical Records of Donald Piland, M.D.;
O. Medical Records of Neurosciences Center of SEMO Hospital;
P. Claim for Compensation \& Stipulation for Compromise Settlement - Injury \#02-151850;
Q. Attorney Contracts; and
R. Marriage Certificate.
Second Injury Fund Exhibit:
I. Deposition of J. Stephen Dolan.
APPLICABLE LAW:
- The test for finding the Second Injury Fund liable for permanent partial disability benefits is set forth in Section 287.220.1 RSMo as follows:
"All cases of permanent disability where there has been previous disability shall be compensated as herein provided. Compensation shall be computed on the basis of the average earnings at the time of the last injury. If any employee who has a pre-existing permanent partial disability whether from compensable injury or otherwise, of such seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to employment or to obtaining re-employment if the employee becomes unemployed, and the pre-existing permanent partial disability, if a body as a whole injury, equals a minimum of fifty weeks of compensation or, if a major extremity injury only, equals a minimum of fifteen percent permanent partial disability, according to the medical standards that are used in determining such compensation, receives a subsequent compensable injury resulting in additional permanent partial disability so that the degree or percentage of disability, in an
amount equal to a minimum of fifty weeks compensation, if a body as a whole injury or, if a major extremity injury only, equals a minimum of fifteen percent permanent partial disability, caused by the combined disabilities is substantially greater than that which would have resulted from the last injury, considered alone and of itself, and if the employee is entitled to receive compensation on the basis of the combined disabilities, the employer at the time of the last injury shall be liable only for the degree or percentage of disability which would have resulted from the last injury had there been no pre-existing disability. After the compensation liability of the employer for the last injury, considered alone, has been determined by an administrative law judge or the commission, the degree or percentage of employee's disability that is attributable to all injuries or conditions existing at the time the las
Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.