Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Nancy McDonald v. Midland Radio Corporation

Decision date: December 31, 2014Injury #07-1061749 pages

Summary

The Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's denial of compensation, finding that the employee's left shoulder rotator cuff tear resulted from a May 2007 fall rather than a June 2007 lifting event, and that the lifting event at most caused an aggravation of the preexisting condition. The employee was found to be permanently and totally disabled from the May 2007 injury, with psychological factors contributing significantly to the disability determination.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Supplemental Opinion)
Injury No. 07-106174
Employee:Nancy McDonald
Employer:Midland Radio Corporation
Insurer:Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
This workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having read the briefs, reviewed the evidence, heard the parties’ arguments, and considered the whole record, we find that the award of the administrative law judge denying compensation is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, we affirm the award and decision of the administrative law judge with this supplemental opinion.
Discussion Permanent total disability and June 2007 lifting event Employee filed a claim for compensation herein alleging injuries sustained while lifting radios. The administrative law judge denied compensation, based in part on a finding that employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of a prior work injury occurring on May 22, 2007, when employee tripped and fell over a cart, landing on her outstretched hands. Employer appeals, arguing that employee should not be deemed permanently and totally disabled as a result of the May 2007 accident considered alone. Employer seeks to shift any liability for permanent total disability benefits to the Second Injury Fund. We are not persuaded, for the following reasons.First, we note that the administrative law judge found that the accident of May 22, 2007, caused employee’s left shoulder rotator cuff tear. We agree. The treating physician, Dr. Craig Satterlee, suggested in his note of August 20, 2007, that employee’s suspected rotator cuff tear was referable to employee’s history of a fall on her outstretched hands with weakness and pain in the left shoulder. Similarly, the treating physician Dr. Rhoades suggested in his note of October 29, 2007, that employee’s likely partial rotator cuff tear was attributable to the May 2007 fall.Second, we acknowledge that employee’s expert, Dr. Koprivica, in rendering his opinion that the June 2007 lifting event did not cause any permanent injury, relied upon somewhat inaccurate facts in that he was unaware of the weight of the radios that employee was attempting to lift. Having said that, we do not find persuasive the competing opinion from Dr. Zarr, because his opinion is purely conclusory. In his one-page response to employer’s request for a rating, Dr. Zarr provides no explanation or reasoning for his assignment of left shoulder disability to the June 2007 event, apart from his review of a letter from employer and portions of employee’s deposition testimony. We note that each of the parties agreed,

at oral argument in this matter, that the lifting event on June 23, 2007, involved employee's performance of a task that was within the scope of her normal work duties. Ultimately, we find insufficient credible expert medical evidence on this record to support a finding that the June 2007 lifting event was the prevailing factor resulting in anything more than an aggravation of the preexisting weakened condition of employee's left shoulder owing to her May 2007 rotator cuff tear. See Johnson v. Ind. Western Express, Inc., 281 S.W.3d 885 (Mo. App. 2009).

Third, we note that each of the experts to address the issue found that employee's psychological problems, particularly her emotional lability and uncontrollable crying episodes, are a major factor in her permanent total disability. Employee credibly testified (and we so find) that her crying spells began after her May 2007 accident, and employee's psychiatric expert, Dr. Todd Hill, assigned all of employee's psychiatric disability to the May 2007 event. We deem Dr. Hill's opinion on this point to be persuasive, and find that the May 2007 accident caused all of employee's permanent psychiatric disability.

Finally, we respond to employer's argument that the May 2007 accident should not be deemed to result in permanent total disability because employee did not receive any medical treatment until after the June 2007 event. Employer's argument is belied by the uncontested fact that employer denied, for no apparent reason, employee's timely and repeated requests for authorized medical care following the May 2007 accident. Employer cannot advance its own disregard of its duties under the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law as a basis for undermining the seriousness of employee's injuries sustained as a result of the May 2007 accident.

Conclusion

We affirm and adopt the award of the administrative law judge as supplemented herein.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Lisa Meiners, issued May 23, 2014, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 31^{\text {st }} \qquad$ day of December 2014.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

John J. Larsen, Jr., Chairman

James G. Avery, Jr., Member

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

FINAL AWARD

Employee: Nancy McDonald

Injury No. 07-106174

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Midland Radio Corporation

Insurer: Hartford Casualty Insurance Company

Additional Party: Missouri Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Hearing Date: April 3, 2014

Checked by: LM/1h

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: June 23, 2007.
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Kansas City, Missouri.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
  9. Was Claim for Compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: While in the course and scope of employment, Claimant lifted two radios from a box aggravating her shoulders.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No. Date of death? N/A
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Shoulders
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: -0 -

Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Employee: Nancy McDonald

  1. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: -0 -
  2. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 354.04
  3. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer?
  4. Employee's average weekly wages:
  5. Weekly compensation rate: $\ 293.34.
  6. Method wages computation: By agreement.

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable: None. The employee did not sustain permanent disability due to the June 2007 accident.
  2. Second Injury Fund liability: None.
  3. Future requirements awarded: No future medical benefits are awarded.

Said payments to begin as of the date of the award and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 percent of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: William Spooner

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Nancy McDonald

Injury No. 07-106174

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Midland Radio Corporation

Insurer: Hartford Casualty Insurance Company

Additional Party: Missouri Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Hearing Date: April 3, 2014

Checked by: LM/1h

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

On April 3, 2014, the parties appeared for final hearing. Nancy McDonald appeared in person and with counsel, William Spooner. The Employer and Insurer appeared by counsel with Shelly Naughtin as their representative. The Second Injury Fund was represented by counsel, Eric Lowe.

STIPULATIONS

The parties stipulated to the following:

1) That Midland Radio Corporation was working subject to Missouri's workers' compensation law on June 23, 2007;

2) That Ms. McDonald was their employee;

3) That she sustained an accident that occurred within the course and scope of her employment on June 23, 2007;

4) That Missouri jurisdiction was proper;

5) That the claim was filed within the time allowed by law and notice was given;

6) That the Employer had provided medical expenses in the amount of $\ 354.04 and no temporary total disability benefits; and

7) That the compensation rate is $\ 293.34.

ISSUES

The issues to be determined by this award are:

1) Whether Claimant sustained any disability; and if so, the nature and extent of that disability;

2) Whether the Employer is liable to the Employee for past medical expenses in the amount of $\ 5,948.63;

3) Whether the Employer is liable to the Employee for future medical care that is reasonably required in order to cure and relieve the effects of the June 23, 2007 injury;

4) The liability of the Second Injury Fund; and

5) Future medical.

Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Employee: Nancy McDonald

Injury No. 07-106174

As background information, the parties stipulated that the Claimant sustained two specific accidents: one on May 22, 2007 and one on June 23, 2007. On May 22, 2007, Claimant fell over a cart containing boxes. She landed on outstretched hands and tore her left pants leg. Claimant testified she felt pain in both shoulders, hands, pelvis, legs and toes. Claimant notified and requested medical care as a result of the fall but it was not provided until she sustained the second accident on June 23, 2007.

On June 23, 2007, Claimant felt increased pain and a pulling sensation of her left shoulder when she lifted two radios out of a box. The Employer at that time then sent Claimant to Concentra Medical Care where she was referred to an orthopaedic surgeon, Dr. Rhoades. Dr. Rhoades found Claimant sustained a partial rotator cuff tear of the left shoulder. Claimant underwent injections of the left shoulder as well without relief.

Claimant during this time period saw her own physician, Dr. Fox, for complaints relating to the neck and the lumbar spine. MRI scans revealed degenerative disc disease, annular tear and disc bulging of the low back. Claimant also saw Dr. Smith who diagnosed Claimant with significant psychological comorbidity that amplified Claimant's pain condition. Claimant received psychiatric treatment in January of 2008 by a Dr. Trombley. Dr. Trombley diagnosed Claimant with generalized anxiety disorder with moderate recurrent major depression. Another doctor who treated Claimant was Dr. Clinefelter. Dr. Clinefelter diagnosed Claimant with chronic myofascial pain syndrome and noted her anxiety and depression coincided with ongoing secondary gain from her workers' compensation case. Regardless, Dr. Clinefelter still recommended psychiatric treatment for depression and trigger injections for the myofascial pain.

Further medical records indicate Claimant received conservative care for chronic pain of the shoulders, back and neck. The majority of records described the accident of May 2007 as the mechanism of injury to her shoulders and back. These records coincide with the treatment she received for the chronic pain of the shoulders, back and neck. Eventually Claimant underwent a left shoulder acromioplasty on March 27, 2009. On July 1, 2009, Claimant was found to be at maximum medical improvement regarding her shoulder by Dr. Rhoades but he continued to administer steroid injections. Claimant then continued to treat at the Kansas Free Health Clinic for

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

Obermann v. BRM LLC(2022)

September 13, 2022#17-088357

reversed

The Commission reversed the ALJ's award of permanent total disability (PTD) benefits from the Second Injury Fund, finding that while the employee sustained a 22.5% permanent partial disability of the right shoulder from the November 3, 2017 work injury, the PTD resulted from a combination of the primary injury and multiple preexisting disabilities including prior knee and ankle injuries. The Court denied SIF liability for PTD benefits because the employee's PTD was not solely attributable to the primary injury combined with preexisting disabilities exclusive of a compensable 1995 left knee injury.

shoulder11,910 words
affirmed

The LIRC affirmed the administrative law judge's award in a medical fee dispute where Timberlake Surgery Center sought additional reimbursement for authorized left shoulder rotator cuff surgery performed on employee James Noel. The court found the HCP's charges fair and reasonable, and entitled to payment, while denying pre-judgment interest and attorney's fees.

shoulder8,438 words
reversed

The Commission reversed the administrative law judge's award finding that an employee suffered a work-related right shoulder injury on April 27, 2018, when she struck her shoulder on a metal dye plate. The Commission determined that the employee was not entitled to workers' compensation benefits or additional medical care for the alleged injury.

shoulder6,891 words
affirmed

The Missouri LIRC affirmed the administrative law judge's denial of workers' compensation benefits for Keavin Edwards' January 30, 2017 left shoulder injury, finding that the incident aggravated a preexisting condition rather than creating a new compensable injury. The Commission found Edwards' testimony not credible regarding the absence of shoulder problems between his 2008 surgery and the 2017 incident, and adopted medical opinions attributing his 35% permanent partial disability to preexisting degeneration and degenerative arthritis rather than the work incident.

shoulder4,189 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award denying workers' compensation benefits to employee Dwayne Southerland for his September 6, 2011 shoulder injury. One commissioner dissented, arguing the Second Injury Fund should be liable for permanent total disability resulting from the combination of the primary injury and pre-existing conditions.

shoulder4,677 words