Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Alan Nold v. Harley-Davidson

Decision date: April 13, 2017Injury #15-1036058 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's temporary award finding that the employee's bilateral upper extremity injury from repetitive work activities (gripping, grabbing, use of vibratory sander, and twisting) at Harley-Davidson on November 30, 2015, was compensable under Missouri workers' compensation law. The award is temporary/partial, subject to future modification, with future medical care awarded and a 25% attorney lien applied.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

TEMPORARY OR PARTIAL AWARD

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 15-103605

Employee: Alan Nold

Employer: Harley-Davidson

Insurer: Trumbull Insurance Company

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission for review as provided by $\S 287.480$ RSMo, which provides for review concerning the issue of liability only. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record concerning the issue of liability, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge in this regard is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms and adopts the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated December 23, 2016.

This award is only temporary or partial, is subject to further order and the proceedings are hereby continued and kept open until a final award can be made. All parties should be aware of the provisions of $\S 287.510$ RSMo.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Angie Heffner Robyn, issued December 23, 2016, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 13^{\text {th }} \qquad$ day of April 2017.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

John J. Larsen, Jr., Chairman

VACANT

Member

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

TEMPORARYAWARD

Employee: Alan Nold

Injury No: 15-103605

Employer: Harley Davidson

Insurer: Trumbull Insurance

Hearing Date: December 15, 2016

Checked by: AHR/lh

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: November 30, 2015.
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted. Kansas City, Platte County, Missouri.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: While working in the course and scope of employment, Claimant performed repetitive activities including but not limited to gripping, grabbing parts, use of a vibratory sander, taking parts in and out of machines and twisting activities with his wrists resulting in injury.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No. Date of death? N/A
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Bi-lateral upper extremities.
  14. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: None.

Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Employee: Alan Nold

  1. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer: Employer has paid for evaluation and diagnostic testing but the total cost amount is unknown.
  2. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 1312.62.
  3. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 875.08 . / \ 464.58.
  4. Method wages computation: Parties stipulate.

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

Future medical care as awarded pursuant to the Award.

The compensation awarded to the Claimant shall be subject to a 25 percent lien in the amount of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: Steffanie Stracke

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Alan Nold

Injury No.: 15-103605

Employer: Harley-Davidson

Insurer: Trumbull Insurance Company c/o Gallagher Bassett.

Hearing Date: December 15, 2016

Checked by: AHR/lh

On December 15, 2016 the Employee and Employer appeared for a temporary hearing for hardship benefits. The Division had jurisdiction to hear this case pursuant to $\S 287.110$. The Employee, Mr. Alan Nold (hereinafter Employee or Claimant), appeared in person and with counsel, Mr. Steffanie Stracke. The Employer, Harley Davidson, (hereinafter Employer), appeared through counsel, Mr. Tom Billam.

STIPULATIONS

The parties stipulated to the following:

  1. That on or about November 30, 2015, Harley Davidson, was an employer operating subject to Missouri Workers' Compensation law with its liability fully insured by Trumbull Insurance Company c/o Gallagher Bassett.
  2. Mr. Nold was its employee working subject to the law in Kansas City, Platte County, Missouri;
  3. Mr. Nold notified Employer of his injuries and filed his claim for compensation within the time allowed by law;
  4. Mr. Nold earned an average weekly wage of $\ 1312.62 resulting in a compensation rate of $\ 875.08 for temporary total disability, and $\ 464.58 for permanent partial disability.

ISSUES

1) Whether Employee sustained an occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment;

2) Is Employer liable for future medical care to cure and relieve the effects of the Employee's injury.

Claimant testified on his behalf and presented Exhibits A and B which were admitted into evidence without objection.

The Employer presented witnesses Chris Nehrbass and Aaron Fife and Exhibits 1-5 all of which were admitted into evidence without objection.

Based on the entire record, Claimant's credible testimony, medical records and the testimony of the Employer's witnesses, Chris Nehrbass (Nehrbass) and Aaron Fife (Fife), and the applicable law in the state of Missouri, I find Claimant sustained an occupational disease which arose out of and in the course of his employment.

Claimant currently works on the assembly line at Harley-Davidson and has since June 1, 2001. Since 2003, he has worked in the Tank Weld Department. Claimant testified that his normal work shift was forty hours a week. Claimant works the night shift and at present based on the production needs of the plant, he is working overtime resulting in an average of 50-64 hours per week.

The Tank Weld Department assignment includes rotating to approximately 20 different stations over a two to three week period of time. All of the 20 different stations require specific tasks requiring use of both hands in a repetitive manner. Claimant testified that he would work at one station for the entire 10 -hour shift. Claimant testified and demonstrated the many repetitive tasks he performed with both hands at several different stations including grabbing, twisting, aligning parts, pinching and gripping. He also uses a vibratory sander that vibrates in his hands when he uses it.

Employer witness Fife also testified that the Claimant works at approximately 20 different stations over a two to three week period. Employer/Insurer admitted a DVD/Video of Claimant into evidence, performing the duties required in two of the stations where he routinely works. Clamant pointed out and Fife admitted that the DVD depicted only two of the 20 work stations Claimant regularly works in. I watched the video and observed that Claimant used both hands in order to accomplish his work demands. (Ex. 2)

Since the video only depicted two of Claimant's job tasks, I relied on his testimony regarding the other duties of his job. Claimant testified at length regarding those various job duties and the motions that were required of his wrists and arms in order to accomplish those job tasks all of which I find to be repetitive in nature. Claimant's entire job involves the repetitive use of his bilateral upper extremities. He is required to grip, twist, grab and grasp tools, parts and machines on a frequent basis.

In addition, I personally observed in the video everything Claimant testified to in detail regarding that portion of the multi-step process required of an employee in the Weld Tank Department of the assembly line. Each of these tasks requires the repetitive use of both of the worker's hands.

Claimant stated that he told his supervisor on November 30, 2015 that his hands were numb to a point they hurt. He reported an injury on December 16, 2015. He testified that he did not feel comfortable making the report until December 16, 2015 because he was worried that he would get fired if he reported the injury. However, his hands got to a point he could not take the constant pain and numbness anymore. Claimant filled out an accident report (Ex. 3) wherein he referenced some of the repetitive motions his job required.

Employer immediately sent Employee for treatment in their in-house health clinic. Claimant participated in a four-week early intervention program. He testified that he first met with a therapist on December 22, 2015. The early intervention program did not provide Claimant any relief and he was then referred to Dr. Brett A. Miller. Dr. Miller examined Claimant at the Harley Davidson plant and then ordered an EMG of both of his hands. Dr. Miller's February 11, 2016 report states that he was going to walk through the plant and observe Claimant's job duties. Claimant testified that this did not happen. The March 15, 2016 EMG found Claimant to have severe bi-lateral carpal tunnel syndrome. (Ex. 3)

Employer contracted with Blankenheim Services to perform a risk assessment analysis of the Tank Weld Department. On March 1, 2016 Chris Nehrbass an Engineering Manager from Blankenheim Services visited the Harley Davidson facility where Claimant worked. Nehrbass observed and videotaped Claimant performing his job duties in two stations in the Tank Weld Department. He observed Claimant performing his job duties in a third station as well. Nehrbass testified that he was informed that the Claimant's position required him to work in approximately 20 stations over a two-three week time period. Nehrbass testified that he was not going to be in the facility long enough to observe Claimant perform his job duties in all 20 stations so he focused on three of the stations that Claimant mentioned in his injury report dated December 16, 2015. In his report, he includes that Claimant told him that all or most stations within his work rotation either contribute or exacerbate his symptoms and that he could not identify a specific task as the primary contributor to his injuries.

Claimant is requesting medical treatment as recommended by Dr. Anne Rosenthal. Dr. Rosenthal diagnosed Claimant with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Dr. Rosenthal physically examined Claimant, reviewed his medical treatment that was provided by the Employer up to the date of her examination including the causation assessment provided by Dr. Miller. I do not find Dr. Miller's opinion to be credible.

RULINGS OF LAW

Claimant asserts that he developed bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome from all the various repetitive work activities he testified to having performed over his past 15 years of employment with Employer. Employer contends that Claimant's work is not the prevailing factor and disputes medical causation.

Having given careful consideration to the entire record, based upon the competent and substantial evidence presented during the hearing, and the applicable law of the State of Missouri, I make the following rulings of law: Claimant sustained an occupational disease which arose out of and in the course of his employment.

Claimant has the burden to prove all essential elements of a claim, including causation. Decker v. Square D Co., 974 S.W.2d 667, 670 (Mo.App. 1998). When a worker seeks compensation for carpal tunnel syndrome, she must submit a medical expert who can establish the probability that working conditions caused the disease. Id. A claimant's medical expert in an occupational disease case must establish within a "reasonable probability" that the disease was

caused by conditions in the work place. Pippin v. St. Joe Minerals Corp., 799 S.W.2d 898, 902 (Mo.App. 1999) (Citations omitted). 'Probable means founded on reason and experience which inclines the mind

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words