Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Diane Koch v. Aldi, Inc.

Decision date: January 31, 2018Injury #13-02626815 pages

Summary

The Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of compensation for a work-related right hip strain injury sustained on April 11, 2013, finding the injury was the prevailing factor in the employee's condition. The employee was determined to be permanently and totally disabled based on the combination of the primary injury with preexisting disabilities and her age, education, and lack of transferable skills.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Supplemental Opinion)
Injury No.: 13-026268
Employee:Diane Koch
Employer:Aldi, Inc.
Insurer:Self-Insured
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
This workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having read the briefs, reviewed the evidence, heard the parties’ arguments, and considered the whole record, we find that the award of the administrative law judge awarding compensation is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, we affirm the award and decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) with this supplemental opinion.
Discussion
The following issues were raised in three applications for review filed in this case:
Counsel for the employer and the Second Injury Fund (SIF) make valid observations that would support a denial of compensation or an award of permanent partial, as opposed to permanent total disability benefits against the SIF. The case was well briefed by all parties.
The employer and the SIF challenge the employee’s credibility. Cognizant of this issue, and while noting some inconsistencies in the employee’s testimony, the ALJ specifically concluded “[O]verall I find [the employee] credible.”2 The Commission is not required to defer to an ALJ’s credibility determination and may come to a different conclusion, so long as there is competent and substantial evidence to support our award.3 That said we give careful consideration to an ALJ’s credibility determination based on her first-hand observation of witnesses. Based upon our review of all of the evidence in this case, we affirm the ALJ’s finding regarding employee’s credibility.

^{1} Employer’s application for review focuses on the issue of nature and extent of the employee’s disability; employer’s brief raises the issue of medical causation. We consider both arguments. ^{2} *Award*, p. 9. ^{3} *Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection*, 121 S.W.3d 220 (Mo., 2003); *McCutchen v. Peoplease Corporation*, 195 S.W.3d 421 (Mo. App., 2006).

We rely on Dr. Volarich's opinion that, within a reasonable degree of medical certainty, the employee's April 11, 2013, injury was the prevailing factor in causing her severe right hip strain, requiring conservative medical treatment. ${ }^{4}$ We further credit Dr. Volarich's opinion that the employee's multiple preexisting disabilities were a hindrance to employment or reemployment and that these disabilities combined synergistically with disability resulting from the primary injury to create substantially greater disability than the simple sum. We conclude consistent with Dr. Volarich's evaluation and the opinion of vocational expert Timothy Lalk, that employee's physical disabilities considered in relation to her age, education, work experience, and lack of transferable skills, have rendered the employee permanently and totally disabled.

Regarding the issue of past medical expenses, we note Dr. Volarich's opinion that the employee's December 2014, right hip replacement was due to wear and tear of a prior hip replacement over a period of eighteen years, unrelated to her primary work injury. ${ }^{5}$ Based on this evidence, we conclude that the ALJ properly found that the employee's outstanding medical bills in the amount of $\ 51,445.81 relating to her 2014 hip revision did not flow from her work injury and that employer is not liable for these past medical expenses.

Award

We affirm and adopt the award of the administrative law judge as supplemented herein.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Kathleen M. Hart, issued June 20, 2017, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $31^{\text {st }}$ day of January 2018.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

John J. Larsen, Jr., Chairman

VACANT

Member

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

Secretary

[^0]

[^0]: ${ }^{4} Transcript, 2227-2228.

{ }^{5}$ Id. 2232.

AWARD

Employee: Diane Koch

Injury No.: 13-026268

Dependents: $\mathrm{n} / \mathrm{a}$

Before the

Injury

Employer: Aldi, Inc.

Division of Workers' Compensation

Department of Labor and Industrial

Additional Party: Second Injury Fund (SIF)

Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Insurer: Self c/o Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.

Hearing Date: March 13, 2017

Checked by: KMH

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: April 11, 2013
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Charles, MO
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Claimant injured right hip and right knee when she fell while climbing off her forklift.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? n/a
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: right hip and right knee
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 15 % PPD of the right hip payable by Employer, and permanent and total disability payable by the SIF as a result of the combination of Claimant's primary and prior injuries and disabilities.
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 13,376.24
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 4,703.85

Employee: Diane Koch Injury No.: 13-026268

  1. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? none
  2. Employee's average weekly wages: unknown
  3. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 714.76 / \ 433.58
  4. Method wages computation: Stipulation

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

31.05 weeks of permanent partial disability from Employer $\ 13,462.66

  1. Second Injury Fund liability:

Indeterminate

Permanent total disability benefits from Second Injury Fund:

weekly differential of $\ 281.18 payable by SIF for 31.05 weeks beginning

August 21, 2013, and, $\ 714.76 weekly thereafter, for as long as provided by law

TOTAL:

INDETERMINATE

  1. Future requirements awarded: see award

Said payments to begin immediately and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 % of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

Ryan Cox

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Diane Koch

Departments: n/a

Employer: Aldi, Inc.

Additional Party: SIF

Injury No.: 13-026268

Before the

Division of Workers'

Compensation

Department of Labor and Industrial

Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Innurer: Self c/o Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.

Checked by: KMH

A hearing was held on the above captioned matter March 13, 2017. Diane Koch (Claimant) was represented by attorney Ryan Cox. Aldi (Employer) was represented by attorney Lynn Barnett. SIF was represented by Assistant Attorney General Barbara Toepke.

The SIF offered Exhibit I, Claimant's facebook posts, over Claimant's objections. The exhibit was admitted subject to the objection, and Claimant was given the opportunity to brief her objection in her proposed award. Claimant did not do so, and Exhibit I is hereby admitted. All remaining objections not expressly ruled on in this award are overruled to the extent they conflict with this award.

STIPULATIONS

The parties stipulated to the following:

  1. Claimant had an accident in the course and scope of her employment for Employer on April 11, 2013.
  2. Venue is proper in St. Louis.
  3. Employer and Claimant were operating under the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation law.
  4. Employer's liability was self-insured c/o CCMSI.
  5. Employer had notice of the accident and a claim for compensation was timely filed.
  6. Claimant's average weekly wage was sufficient to yield rates of $\ 714.76 for TTD/PTD and $\ 433.58 for PPD.
  7. Claimant has been paid compensation to date in the amount of $\ 13,376.24 covering a time period of April 13, 2013 through August 20, 2013. She received \$4,703.85 in medical benefits.

ISSUES

The parties stipulated the issues to be resolved are as follows:

  1. Medical causation
  2. Liability for past medical expenses of $\ 51,445.81
  3. MMI date
  4. Future medical care
  5. TTD from August 21, 2013 through the date of MMI.
  6. Permanent disability
  7. SIF liability

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the competent and substantial evidence, my observations of Claimant at trial, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, I find:

  1. Claimant is a 64 year-old female who graduated from high school and cosmetology school. She has no other vocational training or certification. She began working for Employer in 1979. She worked in the warehouse, and her duties involved unloading trailers, stacking product, filling store orders, operating a fork lift, and various warehouse duties. This was a physical job and required her to stand, lift, bend, squat, climb, and kneel. She worked up to 50 hours a week, and worked for Employer for 34 years.
  2. Prior to her 2013 accident, Claimant had a number of injuries. In 1989, she injured her right hip, and Dr. Whiteside performed a total hip replacement in February 1990. He noted Claimant had congenital dysplasia of the hip with pain for the past five years. She was able to return to work, but her hip bothered her when she had to walk a lot at work. By June 1996, Claimant developed a large osteolytic cyst. Dr. Lux diagnosed a failed total hip replacement and performed a revision of the acetabular component and cup. He released her from treatment in December 1996 and noted she was doing well with no more hip pain.
  3. Leading up to the 2013 accident, Claimant had pain in her hip. She had limitations that slowed her down at work. She was not able to lift as much and could not kneel.
  4. In 1993 Claimant slipped on broken eggs at work and landed on her left elbow. She was treated with injections. She also developed pain in her right elbow. Both elbows were weaker, and she had pain and problems lifting leading up to 2013. Claimant settled a 1994 case for 10 % PPD of the right elbow.
  5. Clamant injured her left knee in 2001 when she fell at work. She tore her meniscus and Dr. Johnson performed arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy and debridement. He released Claimant at MMI in April 2002. Claimant settled this case for 25\% PPD of the left knee. She also settled the SIF aspect of this case for 40 % PPD of the right hip. Leading up to the 2013 accident and continuing, Claimant had s

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.