The parties asked the administrative law judge to resolve the following issues: (1) whether employee¹ sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of employment on December 9, 2016; (2) whether employee's current symptoms of left ankle and left knee are causally related to a work accident on December 9, 2016; (3) whether employer is liable for medical treatment to cure and relieve the effects of the December 9, 2016 accident; and (4) whether employer is liable for costs and expenses due to an unreasonable defense pursuant to § 287.560.
The administrative law judge determined as follows: (1) employee sustained injury arising from a work-related accident on December 9, 2016; (2) employee's symptoms of left knee and ankle complaints are causally related to the December 9, 2016 accident; (3) employer is liable for medical treatment to the left knee and left ankle to cure and relieve the effects of the December 9, 2016 injury; and (4) employer owes costs and expenses due to its unreasonable defense pursuant to § 287.560, in the amount of $21,337.15. The administrative law judge also determined that employer is liable for additional medical care of the left knee and ankle pursuant to § 287.140.1, and future temporary total disability benefits, should an authorized medical provider find it necessary until employee has reached maximum medical improvement or working in the open labor market.
Employer/insurer filed a timely application for review² with the Commission on November 16, 2017, alleging the administrative law judge's award was erroneous in finding: (1) the injury suffered by employee on December 9, 2016, was within the scope
¹ We note that the record and the pleadings in this matter include references to both claimant and employee. Because of the relevant definitions under § 287.020, we generally refer to the injured worker as "employee" and to anyone else pursuing a claim on behalf of the employee, as "claimant." However, in this matter the terms are used interchangeably by the parties and the administrative law judge. We use the designation of "employee" throughout this award.
² Employer/insurer filed an Amended Application for Review on November 20, 2017.
Injury No.: 16-097900
Employee: Karolyn Knierim
- 2 -
and course of employment with employer; (2) employee's left knee and ankle symptoms are causally related to a work injury; (3) that employer is responsible to provide medical treatment for the left knee and ankle; and (4) that employer's defense by denying compensability of the claim was unreasonable and without basis and that attorney's fees and costs pursuant to § 287.560 should be awarded.
We affirm and adopt the administrative law judge's findings, conclusions and award relating to all issues, except as modified below.
We modify the administrative law judge's award only with respect to her findings relating to the award of fees and costs, in the amount of $21,337.15, and for employer's unreasonable defense pursuant to § 287.560. We find that issue is not yet ripe for consideration and decline to rule on the issue in this temporary award. The extent of our review of a temporary award of an administrative law judge is limited to a challenge by a party aggrieved by the finding that the applicant is liable for the payment of any compensation. 8 CSR 20-3.040 (1) - Temporary or Partial Awards.
Discussion
The administrative law judge observed employee at the hearing. She found employee credible, "based upon observation during her testimony" and found employee "credibly testified through the hearing." Award, page 7. We adopt the administrative law judge's credibility finding. Employee's slight delay in reporting her injury on the next workday does not diminish her credibility. Employee credibly described the day, time and circumstances of the accident. She reported injury to her left knee and left ankle. Employee's behavior at work that day in carrying on with her workload on an exceptionally busy day says more about her work ethic than it reflects on the manner in which she displays or hides her pain symptoms. As noted by the administrative law judge, employer provided two witnesses who did not notice employee to be in pain. We agree with the administrative law judge that "two witnesses lack of observation of the event/effects of the event" does not equate to the "event not happening." Award, page 7-8.
We find that the administrative law judge's finding that employee's work-related accident of December 9, 2016 was the prevailing cause of the injury to her left knee and ankle, is well supported. This finding was based on employee's credible testimony; the objective evidence of injury to her left knee and left ankle; and the opinions of authorized medical professionals who treated employee close in time to the accident. Therefore, it follows that employer is responsible for medical care to cure and relieve the effects of employee's injuries.
At this juncture, the matter is not fully litigated and the employee was not at maximum medical improvement at the time this record was submitted for our review. The legislature has recognized the need for a hardship procedure under § 287.510, in order to obtain a temporary award in appropriate circumstances. This necessitates that the evidence that is presented is limited to what has been developed at that stage of the case, and the treatment course pursued to date. Because the record is not yet complete, we conclude the award of fees and costs, is best reviewed at the time that the
Injury No.: 16-097900
Employee: Karolyn Knierim
- 3 -
case has been fully developed. The award of fees and costs in the amount of $21,337.15, pursuant to § 287.560, is not properly resolved at this time.³ Our ruling on this issue is without prejudice to either party raising this issue in the future.
**Order**
We modify the award of the administrative law judge only as to the issue of the award of fees and costs pursuant to § 287.560.
The award and decision of Chief Administrative Law Judge Lisa Pottenger, issued October 30, 2017, is attached hereto and incorporated herein to the extent not inconsistent with this decision and award.
This award is only temporary or partial. It is subject to further order, and the proceedings are hereby remanded to the Division of Worker's Compensation to be kept open until a final award can be made. All parties should be aware of the provisions of § 287.510 RSMo.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 3/5th day of October 2018.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Robert W. Cornejo, Chairman
Reid K. Forrester, Member
Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member
Attest:
Secretary
---
³ Section 287.560 provides "... if any proceedings have been brought, prosecuted or defended without reasonable ground, it may assess the whole cost of the proceedings upon the party who so brought, prosecute or defended them..."
Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Employee: Karolyn Knierim