Employee worked for OTG, LLC, an independent cable and fiber optic installer. Employee's job as an installer required him to lift a ladder that weighed sixty pounds, climb twenty-five to thirty feet to a telephone pole, and haul sixty or seventy pounds of wire from his truck in addition to various tools and equipment. On October 30, 2015, employee sustained an injury at work when the ladder he climbed fell out from underneath him.
The employee sought treatment at Capital Region Medical Center after the injury. Hospital emergency room records documented his account of a seven-foot fall onto gravel after a ladder he climbed fell over, hitting his left side. The employee reported pain in his left wrist and left ribs. He related that he scraped his scalp, but denied any pain in his head. He stated, "[I]t hurts to breathe." Emergency Department admitting physician Dr. Charles Ludy administered anti-nausea and narcotic pain medication and discussed orthopedic follow-up for employee with the VA hospital. As he was about to be discharged, employee used the restroom and noticed excessive blood in his urine. This was of particular concern because employee took blood-thinners for preexisting deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A CT of his abdomen and pelvis "revealed laceration of his left kidney with hematoma." Dr. Ludy arranged for employee's transfer to the trauma center at the University of Missouri (MU Hospital).
At MU Hospital, employee underwent selective left renal embolization and treatment of his left radial fracture that included changing his splint. MU Hospital admission notes list the following injuries attributable to employee's work accident: 1. Left radial fracture; 2. Left grade 2 renal laceration; 3. Hematuria; 4. Acquired coagulopathy on Coumadin; 5. Factor V Leiden mutation with a history of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus and 6. Multiple root abrasions, contusions on the left flank. MU Hospital released employee on November 6, 2015, and referred him to Dr. Jay Bridgeman for follow up on his left wrist fracture.
On February 26, 2016, Dr. Bridgeman released employee to return to light duty work, limiting lifting no greater than ten pounds with his right hand only and ordering that he work only in a clean and dry environment. On April 8, 2016, Dr. Bridgeman recommended twenty-one sessions of physical therapy. On May 20, 2016, the employee saw Dr. Bridgeman for the last time. Dr. Bridgeman assessed employee's left distal radius fracture as healed. He further noted numbness and tingling in employee's left hand consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome, which he considered unrelated to employee's primary injury. Dr. Bridgeman's May 20, 2016, clinic note referenced no restrictions.
2 Transcript, 222.
3 Id. 226.
4 Id. 287.
5 Transcript, 302.
Injury No.: 15-087903
Employee: Thomas Dubuc
- 3 -
**Expert Testimony**
Dr. Mitchell C. Mullins, an emergency and urgent care osteopathic physician examined employee on June 28, 2016, for the purpose of assessing disability from employee's October 30, 2015, accident.
In a June 29, 2016, report documenting his independent medical examination (IME), Dr. Mullins noted employee's history of prior back pain since a fall off of an 18-foot wall in 2010, from which employee suffered a nondisplaced vertebral fracture, concussion and shoulder dislocation. He further noted employee's past medical history of depression, hyperlipidemia, factor V Leiden with history of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and hernia repairs in 1988 and 1995. Dr. Mullins' June 29, 2016, report specifically noted that the employee's October 30, 2015, injury caused "an exacerbation of pre-existing low back pain [emphasis added]." The report did not include an assessment of employee's impairment related to any of the referenced preexisting conditions.
Dr. Mullins' June 29, 2016, report only evaluated impairment relating to employee's primary, October 30, 2015, work injury. With respect to this injury, Dr. Mullins determined disability of:
- 12% of the body as a whole rated at the lumbar spine
- 36% permanent partial disability rated at the left wrist, relating to traumatic arthritis and posttraumatic carpal tunnel syndrome
- 5% permanent partial disability rated at the left elbow due to lateral epicondylitis
- 6% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole due to kidney laceration, including post injury scarring and possible long-term effects on renal function
Dr. Mullins' June 29, 2016, report includes a Medical Source Statement of Ability to Do Work-Related Activities, dated July 5, 2016. This statement lists employee's physical restrictions supported by Dr. Mullins' June 29, 2016, diagnosis. Dr. Mullins' June 29, 2016, report expressly includes diagnoses both of employee's "present injury" and employee's "pre-existing injuries or diseases." The fact that Dr. Mullins' June 29, 2016, report did not include impairment ratings related to employee's diagnosed preexisting conditions did not preclude Dr. Mullins from considering employee's preexisting conditions in the physical restrictions he cited in his July 5, 2016, statement. We find that the list of physical restrictions cited in Dr. Mullins' Medical Source Statement of Ability to Do Work-Related Activities report were supported by Dr. Mullins' diagnoses related to employee's "present injury" sustained on October 30, 2015, as well as Dr. Mullins' diagnosis of employee's multiple preexisting injuries and diseases as specifically identified in his June 29, 2016, report.
6 Id. 81.
7 Id. 84.
8 Id. 81.
Injury No.: 15-087903
Employee: Thomas Dubuc
- 4 -
Dr. Mullins subsequently produced a second report dated September 1, 2016, specifically assessing disabilities that preexisted employee's October 30, 2015, primary injury. In this supplemental report, Dr. Mullins assessed impairment from employee's preexisting disabilities as:
- 10% PPD BAW rated at the thoracolumbar spine due to compression fractures at T12 and L2.
- 18% PPD rated at the right shoulder due to prior dislocation
- 23% PPD rated at the abdomen BAW due to recurrent bilateral inguinal hernias
- 25% PPD BAW due to factor V Leiden deficiency and chronic anticoagulation
- 9% PPD BAW due to depression
- 8% PPD BAW rated at the cervical spine due to acquired spinal stenosis and degenerative disc disease
Dr. Mullins' September 1, 2016, report concluded, "In light of the multiple pre-existing injuries as well as the significant trauma on October 30, 2015, it is my opinion the patient is permanently and totally disabled as a result of this combination."9
In addition to Dr. Mullins' June 29, 2016, and September 1, 2016, reports, based on his June 28, 2016, IME, the record also includes Dr. Mullins' November 13, 2017, deposition testimony. Dr. Mullins' testimony confirmed his opinion that the restrictions he cited on July 5, 2016, were based on the entirety of employee's conditions, including "The worsening of his back, his carpal tunnel, the pain that he has on-going with his ribs, elbow."10 Id. Dr. Mullins' statement that he considered employee to be permanently and totally disabled even prior to specifically evaluating impairment attributable to each of employee's preexisting conditions does not persuade us to conclude that Dr. Mullins considered employee's permanent and total disability to be exclusively attributable to his October 30, 2015, primary injury.
Given that Dr. Mullins' June 29, 2016, report assesses only permanent partial disability related to employee's primary injury, it is illogical to conclude that Dr. Mullins would have found employee permanently and totally disabled solely as a result of the primary injury on that date. Dr. Mullins' arguably inconsistent agreement with the Second Injury Fund's attorney's suggestion that he had already "determined" employee permanently and totally disabled at the time of his June 28, 2016, exam, overlooks the plain meaning of Dr. Mullins' deposition testimony as a whole as well as the opinions carefully set out in his June 29, 2016, and September 1, 2016, written reports. To attribute substantial weight to a single inconsistent statement imposes the sort of "overly technical and parsed analysis" of medical evidence that courts have admonished the Commission to avoid. Malam v. Dep't of Corr. 492 S.W.3d 926, 929 (Mo. 2016); See also Moss v. Treasurer of Missouri-Custodian of the Second Injury Fund (WD 81467, 2018), transfer denied by Supreme Court of Missouri, April 2, 2019.
9 Id. 89.
10 Id. 1239-1240.
Injury No.: 15-087903
Employee: Thomas Dubuc
- 5 -
Vocational expert Dr. David Ross Strauser<sup>11</sup> testified by deposition on November 13, 2017. Dr. Strauser conducted an evaluation of employee on June 23, 2017. Based on his review of employee's medical records, he noted preexisting disabilities including multiple fractures to employee's back, a shoulder dislocation, multiple hernia repairs and hyperlipidemia, factor V Leiden with a history of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Dr. Strauser noted that prior to his 2010 work injury employee fulfilled his necessary job duties despite multiple disabilities, but experienced significant pain and discomfort at the end of the workday that required extensive medical activities to manage. He noted that employee's preexisting depression impacted his ability to work in 2012, three years prior to the primary injury, and characterized employee's score of sixty on a global assessment of his functioning constituted a "significant impairment in functioning based on the combination of his psychiatric condition along with his other medical conditions."<sup>12</sup> Dr. Strauser testified, based on his expertise as a Social Security disability consultant, that prior to his October 30, 2015, injury employee may have been considered permanently and totally disabled solely as a result of his preexisting disabilities.
Based on Dr. Mullins' physical restrictions, which as we have found considered both employee's preexisting disabilities and disability from the primary injury, Dr. Strauser opined that there are no jobs available in the current economy that employee would be able to maintain on a regular basis. He further considered employee's potential for retraining "unlikely" not because of any intellectual impairment but rather because employee's multiple chronic health conditions would make it difficult for him to complete such a program.<sup>13</sup> Dr. Strauser concluded, "[B]ased on the culmination of all those injuries, [the employee] would be precluded from meeting the demands of the labor market and therefore would be a hundred percent vocationally impaired or permanently and totally disabled."<sup>14</sup>
Based on the compromise settlement employee entered into with employer/insurer, we find as a factual matter that employee's disability related to the October 30, 2015, injury is 30% of the left wrist and 13.5% of the body as a whole referable to the kidneys and low back. We further find, based on Dr. Mullins' and Dr. Strauser's expert opinions, that employee's undisputed permanent and total disability is attributable to a combination of industrially disabling preexisting conditions in combination with disability from the primary injury.
Law
Second Injury Fund Liability
Section 287.220 RSMo creates the Second Injury Fund and provides when and what compensation shall be paid in "all cases of permanent disability where there has been previous disability." As a preliminary matter, the employee must show that he suffers
<sup>11</sup> We address Mr. Strauser as "Dr." in recognition of his Ph.D. in rehabilitation counseling psychology.
<sup>12</sup> Transcript, 1272.
<sup>13</sup> Id. 1284.
<sup>14</sup> Id. 1287.
Injury No.: 15-087903
Employee: Thomas Dubuc
- 6 -
from "a preexisting permanent partial disability whether from compensable injury or otherwise, of such seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to employment or to obtaining reemployment if the employee becomes unemployed..." /d.
Missouri courts have articulated the following test for determining whether a preexisting disability constitutes a "hindrance or obstacle to employment":
[T]he proper focus of the inquiry is not on the extent to which the condition has caused difficulty in the past; it is on the potential that the condition may combine with a work-related injury in the future so as to cause a greater degree of disability than would have resulted in the absence of the condition.
*Knisley v. Charleswood Corp.*, 211 S.W.3d 629, 637 (Mo. App. 2007) (citation omitted).
Section 287.220 requires us to first determine the compensation liability of the employer for the last injury, considered alone. *Landman v. Ice Cream Specialties, Inc.*, 107 S.W.3d 240, 248 (Mo. 2003).