Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Harold Hines, Jr. v. Auto-Tire

Decision date: June 25, 2019Injury #11-05753213 pages

Summary

The LIRC affirmed the administrative law judge's award of permanent partial disability benefits of $16,837.52 against the Second Injury Fund for an employee with a primary thoracic spine injury combined with a preexisting lumbar spine injury. The Commission determined that the employee's preexisting lumbar disability constituted a potential hindrance or obstacle to employment despite his past ability to work, and the current work-related thoracic spine injury combined with the preexisting condition to cause greater overall disability.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Supplemental Opinion)

**Injury No.:** 11-057532

**Employee:** Harold Hines, Jr.

**Employer:** Auto-Tire (Settled)

**Insurer:** Travelers Indemnity Co. of America (Settled)

**Additional Party:** Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund

This workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having read the briefs, reviewed the evidence, heard the parties' arguments, and considered the whole record, we find that the award of the administrative law judge awarding compensation is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, we affirm the award and decision of the administrative law judge with this supplemental opinion.

Preexisting permanent partial disability for purposes of Second Injury Fund liability

The administrative law judge finds, "Claimant has failed to carry his burden to show through clear and convincing evidence how his prior injuries whether physical or psychiatric have ever been a hindrance or obstacle to his employment. Claimant not only worked 80-100 hours a week, but additionally pursued a career in competitive professional billiards." The administrative law judge denied employee's claim for permanent total disability but awarded permanent partial disability in the amount of $16,837.52 against the Second Injury Fund, concluding that "The evidence does support a finding Claimant is entitled to permanent partial disability benefits [because the] credible evidence established [employee's] primary thoracic spine injury combined with the preexisting lumbar spine injury." The Second Injury Fund did not appeal the administrative law judge's award, argued in its brief that the administrative law judge "did not err in calculating PPD benefits," and specifically asked the Commission to affirm the administrative law judge's award.

Section 287.220 RSMo creates the Second Injury Fund and provides when and what compensation shall be paid in all cases of permanent disability where there has been previous disability. As a preliminary matter, the employee must show that he suffers from "a preexisting permanent partial disability whether from compensable injury or otherwise, of such seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to employment or to obtaining reemployment if the employee becomes unemployed." 287.220.2 RSMo.

Missouri courts have articulated the following test for determining whether a preexisting disability constitutes a "hindrance or obstacle to employment":

> [T]he proper focus of the inquiry is "not on the extent to which the condition has caused difficulty in the past; it is on the potential that the condition may combine

1 Award, p. 7.

2 Id., p. 8.

3 Brief of Respondent, Second Injury Fund, filed January 25, 2019, pp. 8-9.

- 2 -

Injury No.: 11-057532

Employee: Harold Hines, Jr.

with a work-related injury in the future so as to cause a greater degree of disability than would have resulted in the absence of the condition." (emphasis in original) *Wuebbeling v. West County Drywall*, 898SW2 615, 620 (Mo. App. E.D.1995).

*Knisley v. Charleswood Corp.*, 211 S.W.3d 629, 637 (Mo. App. 2007).

Pursuant to *Knisley* employee's past ability to work despite preexisting disabling conditions does not, in and of itself, preclude those conditions from constituting a potential hindrance or obstacle to employee's employment or reemployment in the future. Applying this legal standard, we find that the credible evidence in this case, including the expert medical opinion of Dr. David Volarich, demonstrates that employee's preexisting lumbar disability constituted a potential hindrance or obstacle to employment. We further find that employee's preexisting lumbar disability combined with thoracic spine injury attributable to the primary injury to cause a greater degree of disability than would have resulted in the absence of this preexisting condition. Based on this reasoning, we affirm the administrative law judge's award of permanent partial disability in the amount of $16,837.52 against the Second Injury Fund in this case.

The above clarification of the administrative law judge's award does not detract from his correct analysis of the evidence in the record or his ultimate legal conclusions.

Conclusion

We affirm and adopt the award of the administrative law judge as supplemented herein.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Marvin O. Teer, Jr., dated August 22, 2018, is attached and incorporated herein to the extent not inconsistent with this supplemental decision.

We approve and affirm the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 25th day of June 2019.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

ABSTRACT

Robert W. Cornsjo, Chairman

Reid K. Forrester, Member

DISSENTING OPINION FILED

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Secretary

Injury No.: 11-057532

Employee: Harold Hines, Jr.

DISSENTING OPINION

I have read the briefs of the parties and reviewed the whole record. I have considered all of the competent and substantial evidence based on the record as a whole. Based on my review of the evidence as well as my consideration of the relevant provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, I find the employee has proven that the combination of injuries sustained in his compensable work injury on July 7, 2011, and prior disabilities caused permanent total disability.

Employee is fifty-two years of age. He had surgery in 1984 for a right shoulder injury sustained while playing high school football. The military rejected him due to his shoulder injury and flat feet. Employee sustained a compression fracture after a 1987 motor vehicle accident. In 1995, he sustained a work injury that resulted in 6% permanent partial disability referable to his back. Employee was physically abused by his father and sought treatment from a psychologist for approximately twenty years to cope with the effects of childhood abuse. Employee is diabetic and insulin dependent. Despite this multitude of preexisting conditions employee reported to examining physician Dr. David Volarich that he worked ten to thirteen hours a day, five to six days a week prior to his July 7, 2011, work injury. During this time, he tried to manage continuing pain in his thoracic spine with over-the-counter medications.

Employee suffered a thoracic strain at work on July 7, 2011, while removing a tire from the trunk of a customer's vehicle at employer's tire store. The company doctor imposed medical restrictions that included no lifting, pushing or pulling over fifteen pounds and sit down duty only. Subsequent events at work on September 26, 2011, and October 1, 2011, caused transient increases in employee's symptoms. Employee's back condition returned to baseline after both of these events. Employee quit his job in October of 2011 because he was no longer able to perform his work duties from 7:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. for extended periods with no time off. He is unable to remain in one position for longer than about thirty minutes due to persistent mid and low back pain that radiates down his legs and arms. His frequent need to change positions and rearrange multiple pillows he uses for back support at night causes frequent interruptions of his sleep. Employee's current condition, including bowel and bladder problems and morbid obesity, has adversely affected his personal relationships and sense of well-being. He is barely able to socialize because his pain causes him to snap at people on a regular basis and to stutter when he tries to converse. His valued relationship with his only child, a teenage daughter, has suffered because he is no longer able to enjoy activities with her or provide financial support.

Pursuant to an independent medical examination on July 17, 2014, Dr. David Volarich found that employee had preexisting industrial disability consisting of:

- 35% permanent partial disability of the lumbar spine due to chronic lumbar syndrome from degenerative disc disease;

- 5% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole at the thoracic spine, due to thoracic pain syndrome and paresthesias;

- 15% permanent partial disability of the right upper extremity rated at the shoulder due to fracture requiring surgical repair and resultant lost motion, weakness and atrophy.

In assessing employee's preexisting disability, Dr. Volarich further noted, "Considerable psychiatric disability exists."

1 Transcript, 101.

2 Transcript, 106.

Injury No.: 11-057532

Employee: Harold Hines, Jr.

- 2 -

Dr. Volarich noted that employee's chronic lumbar syndrome accounted for significant back pain requiring narcotics and muscle relaxants and resulted in loss of motion; that employee's thoracic disability resulted in pain syndrome and paresthesias; and that employee's right upper extremity condition accounted for lost motion, mild weakness and atrophy in his dominant arm.

Dr. Volarich found employee's disability due to the July 7, 2011, primary injury consisted of 25% permanent partial disability related to the lower spine and rib cage and 5% rated at the body as a whole due to aggravation of lumbar pain syndrome.

Dr. Volarich found that the combination of employee's disabilities creates a substantially greater disability than the simple sum or total of each separate injury/illness and suggested a loading factor. He considered employee permanently and totally disabled due to the combination of his preexisting medical conditions and psychiatric disabilities in combination with disability attributable to the July 7, 2011, primary injury. Dr. Volarich deferred to psychiatric experts for an assessment of employee's psychiatric disability.

Psychiatrist Dr. Adam Sky evaluated employee as having 25% preexisting permanent partial psychiatric disability. He diagnosed major depression, anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). He found that employee's work injuries of July 7, 2011, September 26, 2011, and October 1, 2011, exacerbated his preexisting psychiatric disability and were the prevailing cause that resulted in 75% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole from a psychiatric standpoint.

Psychiatrist Dr. Jay L. Liss found that employee had preexisting psychiatric disability prior to his three back injuries consisting of PTSD, with associated anxiety and depression, complicated by congenital attention deficit disorder. He evaluated employee's preexisting psychiatric disability as 25% of the body as a whole. Dr. Liss further found that employee had additional psychiatric diagnosis of pain syndrome with associated anxiety and depression after his work accident. Dr. Liss concluded that these conditions combined in a way that the sum was greater than the individual disabilities and concluded employee was permanently and totally disabled.

As employee's attorney notes in his brief, the administrative law judge tacitly admits that employee is permanently and totally disabled by stating, "[T]he court cannot determine if Claimant's last injury alone caused his permanent total disability or if a combination of Claimant's injuries and prior disabilities caused his permanent total disability."3

The administrative law judge refused to consider psychiatric disability in his assessment of the nature and extent of employee's permanent disability because he found that employee produced no expert medical testimony specifically apportioning a portion of employee's psychiatric disability to his July 7, 2011, work injury. In so finding, the administrative law judge ignores evidence of employee's settlement with employer/insurer prior to hearing, which apportioned

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award that the health care provider's application for payment of additional reimbursement of medical fees was not timely filed under § 287.140.4, RSMo. The court rejected the provider's argument that the statute version effective on the date of injury should apply, holding that medical fee disputes are governed by the statute version effective on the date services were provided, not the date of the original workers' compensation injury.

spine3,947 words

Sees v. Best Buy Company, Inc.(2020)

March 20, 2020#13-029338MFD13-014190

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's Final Award on Medical Fee Dispute, finding that the health care provider's application for payment of additional reimbursement was not timely filed as required by § 287.140.4. The Commission preserved constitutional arguments raised by the health care provider for potential appeal but did not address them as outside their jurisdiction.

spine2,477 words

Fenwick v. The Doe Run Company(2019)

December 4, 2019#15-029217

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation to employee Thomas Fenwick for spine injuries sustained on April 28, 2015. The Commission found Dr. Volarich's medical opinion establishing causation of disability to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine to be more persuasive than competing medical opinions.

spine4,903 words

The Commission modified the administrative law judge's award regarding the nature and extent of permanent disability and Second Injury Fund liability, while supplementing the award on medical causation. The case involved a June 15, 2005 motor vehicle accident with competing expert medical testimony regarding spine injuries and permanent total disability.

spine10,132 words

Bay v. Bays Window & Siding(2012)

March 21, 2012#07-132545

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's denial of the employee's claims for permanent total disability and permanent partial disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. The Commission found the employee was not permanently and totally disabled based on credible vocational evidence showing available jobs within his physical restrictions, and determined the Second Injury Fund was not liable for benefits.

spine1,362 words