Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Sabrina Williams v. City of Jennings

Decision date: October 3, 2019Injury #10-07090617 pages

Summary

The Missouri LIRC affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's amended award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Sabrina Williams for post-traumatic stress disorder and panic disorder with agoraphobia resulting from a September 7, 2010 workplace attack by an inmate. The Commission corrected an incomplete quote from the treating psychiatrist and clarified the applicable statutory provisions for this 2010 injury case.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Amended Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

**Injury No.:** 10-070906

**Employee:** Sabrina Williams

**Employer:** City of Jennings

**Insurer:** Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance Company

**Additional Party:** Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence, read the parties' briefs, heard their arguments, and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the amended award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the amended award and decision of the administrative law judge dated December 27, 2018, with the following corrections:

**Amended Award, Page 7,** paragraph 3 contains a quote from Dr. Jennifer E. Brockman, which is incomplete. We correct that paragraph as follows:

> Dr. Brockman concluded, "It is my opinion that the work-related injury of September 7, 2010, represents the prevailing factor in Ms. Williams' development of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia. Furthermore, it represents the prevailing factor in the exacerbation of her pre-existing psychiatric conditions, including Major Depressive Disorder-Recurrent, Severe without Psychotic Features and Generalized Anxiety Disorder."

**Transcript, page 147.**

We further clarify any confusion that may have arisen regarding the administrative law judge's inclusion of citation to 2013 amendments to the statute (effective January 1, 2014), in analyzing this 2010 injury. **Amended Award, page 10.** Since all the injuries at issue here, both primary and preexisting, arose prior to January 1, 2014, § 287.220.2 RSMo applies.¹ **Cosby v. Treasurer, No. SC97317 (Mo. June 25, 2019).**

¹ The relevant text of former subsection 287.220.1 (pre-amendment) is identical in all respects to current subsection 287.220.2 RSMo.

-2-

Injury No. 10-070906

The amended award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Joseph P. Keaveny, issued on December 27, 2018, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 3rd day of October 2019.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

SEPARATE OPINION FILED

Robert W. Cornelo, Chairman

Reid K. Forrester, Member

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

Secretary

Injury No.: 10-070906

Employee: Sabrina Williams

CONCURRING IN PART, DISSENTING IN PART

I have reviewed and considered all of the competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and after having read the parties' briefs and heard their arguments, I agree with the majority in all respects, except on the issue of Second Injury Fund liability. Based on my review of the evidence as well as my consideration of the relevant provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, I believe the decision of the administrative law judge should be modified to apportion liability for permanent total disability against the Second Injury Fund, with an award of permanent partial disability attributed to employer.

It is clear that employee is permanently and totally disabled from psychiatric injuries, and that a substantial portion of that disability is attributed to the work-related injury on September 7, 2010, when she was attacked by an inmate in her workplace and beaten, resulting in permanent psychological injury. Dr. Jennifer E Brockman, the psychiatrist who performed an independent medical evaluation of employee, at her attorney's request, opined that employee was permanently and totally disabled from a psychiatric standpoint alone, which I interpret as, excluding disability from any physical injuries. Amended Award, page 7.

As noted by Dr. Brockman, employee has difficulty interacting with strangers which would affect a large portion of available jobs requiring dealing with the public. She has agoraphobic episodes. As of June 25, 2018, Dr. Brockman noted employee suffers from chronic anxiety and panic attacks, is subject to mood swings, irritability and thoughts of self-harm. Employee still has problems with getting adequate sleep due to her anxiety symptoms. She has additional symptoms of difficulty concentrating, periods of physical aggression, and frustration intolerance. For these reasons, Dr. Brockman opined that employee could not be expected to compete with others in the open market for jobs and even interviewing would be an obstacle, given her difficulty in trusting strangers and speaking with them. She could not perform the usual duties of employment as customarily expected by employers. I agree with the very knowledgeable administrative law judge and the majority, that employee is clearly permanently and totally disabled.

The administrative law judge concludes, (as does the majority) that employee's permanent and total disability is due to the work injury alone, and that pathology from the work injury "completely supplants" her condition prior to the attack, I respectfully disagree. I note that the administrative law judge relies on Dr. Brockman's statement at page 148 of the transcript, that "Ms. Williams is permanently and totally disabled from a psychiatric standpoint alone as a result of her symptoms," to find that the work injury alone caused her to be permanently and totally disabled. Amended Award, page 7. However, the doctor went on to enumerate the percentages of disability she attributed to preexisting psychiatric conditions and those resulting from the primary injury, including some exacerbations of prior conditions.

Injury No. 10-070906

Employee: Sabrina Williams

- 2 -

In regard to the primary injury, Dr. Brockman attributed 30% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole, referable to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and 10% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole, referable to Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia. She found the work injury to be the prevailing factor in the development of these conditions. She attributed an exacerbation of employee's preexisting Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Severe without Psychotic Features, at 20% permanent partial disability; and exacerbation of Generalized Anxiety Disorder at 10% permanent partial disability, as a result of the primary injury. Transcript, pages 147-148.

In regard to preexisting conditions, Dr. Brockman opined 10% permanent partial disability attributed to Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Severe without Psychotic Features; and 5% permanent partial disability attributed to preexisting Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Id.

Employer/insurer's independent medical evaluator, Dr. Gregg Bassett, also a psychiatrist, opined that employee had a permanent partial disability due to psychiatric injuries, and that the resulting disability was due to a combination of the primary and preexisting injuries. He opined that the employee only sustained an overall 40% permanent partial disability, with 10% of that disability referable to the preexisting psychopathology. Dr. Bassett, also noted what he referred to as conversion disorder symptoms as affecting employee's functioning. In contrast, Dr. Brockman noted that she had not observed any such symptoms and that such a condition is generally chronic. Nevertheless, she acknowledged that it was possible that, as Dr. Bassett suggested, emotional disruption could have a relationship to such a disorder, and it is possible that a recurrence of such symptoms could occur in the future. But at the time of her evaluation in April 2013, Dr. Brockman would not attribute any of employee's symptoms or any disability referable to a conversion disorder. I find Dr. Brockman's medical opinions and observations to be credible and persuasive.

Given that both medical experts opined that employee had preexisting disabilities and her overall disability resulted from a combination of those conditions with the primary injury, in my opinion it follows that some portion of employee's disability is from her preexisting conditions. I find the opinion of Dr. Brockman to be more persuasive that employee's preexisting injuries were of such seriousness to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to her employment. This is evidenced by employee's prior significant mental health episodes, including at least one suicide attempt in younger years; a lengthy period of time as an adult when she was unable to work as ordered by psychiatric physicians between September 2007 to September 2008; and a brief hospitalization in 2007, which by some reports, was related to mental health issues.

Since all the injuries at issue here, both primary and preexisting, arose prior to the amendments to § 287.220 RSMo, effective in 2014, we look to what is now numbered as §287.220.2 of the statute. I would find employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of the primary injury and preexisting conditions. I would find the employer/insurer's liability at 70% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole referable to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia, in addition to exacerbation of Major Depressive Disorder and General

TI3681-0961

Injury No. 10-070906

Employee: Sabrina Williams

- 3 -

Anxiety Disorder. Therefore, the Second Injury Fund is liable for permanent total disability after 280 weeks of permanent partial disability paid by the employer/insurer.

Since the majority has voted to affirm the administrative law judge's amended award, dated December 27, 2018, without Second Injury Fund liability, I respectfully dissent.

Robert W. Cornejo, Chairman

Employee:Sabrina WilliamsInjury No.: 10-070906
Dependents:N/ABefore the
Employer:City of JenningsDivision of Workers' Compensation
Department of Labor and
Industrial Relations
Additional PartyTreasurer as Custodian of the SecondOf Missouri
Injury Fund
Insurer:Missouri Employers Mutual InsuranceJefferson City, Missouri
Company
Hearing Date:9/25/2018Checked by: JPK

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: 9/7/2010
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Jennings, Missouri
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Claimant is a corrections officer who was assaulted about the head and face by an inmate.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Psychiatric
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: Total Permanent Disability
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 39,569.11
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 63,405.18
  1. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? Indeterminate
  2. Employee's average w

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words