The administrative law judge erred in finding that employee is not permanently and totally disabled and therefore precluded from a claim for compensation against the Second Injury Fund pursuant to $\S 287.220 .3(2)$.
On October 14, 2014, a client of employer's state mental hospital hit employee multiple times in the back of the head and neck, slammed her against a counter, threw employee to the floor, and continued to hit and kick employee ultimately throwing a chair at her. That injury is the subject of employee's separate companion claim, assigned Injury No. 14-078566.
The appeal herein involves employee's subsequent March 10, 2015, injury in which a combative client kicked her in the left knee. This appeal implicates employee's prior, October 14, 2014, injury as a preexisting disability.
The administrative law judge denied both claims, finding, as a threshold matter, that employee is not permanently and totally disabled and therefore not eligible for compensation from the Second Injury Fund pursuant to the requirements of $\S 287.220 .3(2)$. In this appeal, the administrative law judge further found that even assuming employee was permanently and totally disabled she failed to meet the requirements of $\S 287.220 .3(2)$ because none of her preexisting work related disabilities met the fifty-week threshold and employee's sole preexisting non-compensable disability, her psychiatric condition, did not aggravate or accelerate her March 10, 2015, left knee.
As discussed in my dissenting opinion in the companion appeal relating to employee's Injury No. 14-078566, I disagree with the administrative law judge's conclusion that employee is not permanently, totally disabled based on his pejorative assessment of employee's credibility and disparagement of her experts' opinions. Common sense dictates that a worker exposed on a daily basis to violent attacks as a security aide in a mental hospital risks mental disability.
It is significant to point out that employee was in a delicate psychiatric state leading up to the October 14, 2014, violent assault. Prior to this injury employee took Paxil, Depakote, and Xanax and had started to have sleep problems due to her fears about attacks at work.
Not only did employee's October 14, 2014, work accident result in disability, her forced viewing of a video of the assault sent employee into a severely mentally impaired state. After watching the video of the assault, employee started having nightmares, paranoia, and anxiety, depression, and memory problems.
Dr. A. E. Daniel outlined employee's prior mental health issues. His testing showed "depression including low mood, feelings of guilt and worthlessness, anxiety." He found the October 2014 injury to result in PTSD. Dr. Daniel found that employee had preexisting disability of 20 % of the body as a whole due to her preexisting psychiatric condition. He found her permanently and totally disabled "due to a combination of her current psychiatric disability and her preexisting disability." Transcript, 759.