Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Carol Sanders, Employee/Appellant, v. Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc., Employer/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar employment law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Carol Sanders, Employee/Appellant, v. Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc., Employer/Respondent. Case Number: 73695 Handdown Date: 05/26/1998 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Thomas P. Traube Counsel for Respondent: Patrick J. Horgan Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J., Teitelman, J., and Blackmar, Sr.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Carol Sanders (Employee) appeals from the award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission entered in favor of Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc. (Employer), denying her claim for compensation. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the award is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

Kathryn Torre-Stewart, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. The Washington University-St. Louis, Respondent/Defendant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 24, 2026#ED113602

affirmed

The court affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's disability discrimination and hostile work environment claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act because she failed to plead facts demonstrating legal disability or a hostile work environment based on disability. However, the court reversed and remanded the retaliation claim, finding that plaintiff alleged sufficient facts establishing the elements of retaliation under the Act based on her complaints of disability discrimination.

Read The Employment Law GuideGuide
Civil Litigationper_curiam7,351 words
Read opinion