OTT LAW

Carol Sanders, Employee/Appellant, v. Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc., Employer/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Carol Sanders, Employee/Appellant, v. Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc., Employer/Respondent. Case Number: 73695 Handdown Date: 05/26/1998 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Thomas P. Traube Counsel for Respondent: Patrick J. Horgan Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J., Teitelman, J., and Blackmar, Sr.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Carol Sanders (Employee) appeals from the award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission entered in favor of Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc. (Employer), denying her claim for compensation. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the award is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions