OTT LAW

Charlotte Dace, Employee/Appellant, v. Roadway Express, Inc., Employer/Respondent, and Roadway Services, Inc., c/o Liberty Mutual Insurance, Insurer/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Charlotte Dace, Employee/Appellant, v. Roadway Express, Inc., Employer/Respondent, and Roadway Services, Inc., c/o Liberty Mutual Insurance, Insurer/Respondent. Case Number: No. 72275 Handdown Date: 09/02/1997 Appeal From: Labor Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Evan J. Beaty Counsel for Respondent: Dan Chatfield Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Reinhard, P.J., Karohl and Dowd, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Claimant appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her request for continuing medical treatment and temporary total disability benefits. We affirm. The award is supported by competent and substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions