Debra Y. Sanders, Employee-Respondent, v. Echlin/Pacer Industries, Employer-Appellant, and National Union Fires Ins. Co. c/o Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Insurer-Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Debra Y. Sanders, Employee-Respondent, v. Echlin/Pacer Industries, Employer-Appellant, and National Union Fires Ins. Co. c/o Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Insurer-Appellant. Case Number: 72857 Handdown Date: 03/31/1998 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Timothy M. Tierney and Mary Anne Lindsey Counsel for Respondent: Donald S. Singer and Kenneth E. Dick Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Echlin/Pacer Industries and its insurer, National Union Fire Ins. Co. c/o Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., (collectively referred to as Employer) appeal from a Temporary or Partial Award of workers' compensation benefits entered in favor of Debra Y. Sanders (Claimant) by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). (FN1) Employer contends the Commission erred as a matter of law in (1) finding Claimant sustained her burden of proving her medical condition was clearly work-related, as required by section 287.020 RSMo 1994, in the absence of expert medical opinion that Claimant's lifting activities at work were a substantial factor in causing the resulting medical condition; (2) finding Claimant had not unreasonably refused to submit to medical treatment offered by Employer under section 287.140.5 RSMo 1994; (3) awarding Claimant attorney's fees pursuant to section 287.203 RSMo 1994, as interpreted in P.M. v. Metromedia Steakhouses Co., 931 S.W.2d 846 (Mo. App.
E.D. 1996); and (4) finding employee had sustained a compensable injury for which future medical care was required pursuant to section 287.140 RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The Commission's award is supported by substantial and competent evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Footnotes: FN1. The State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund is not a party to this appeal although it is a party to the administrative proceedings below. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
Kathryn Torre-Stewart, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. The Washington University-St. Louis, Respondent/Defendant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 24, 2026#ED113602
The court affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's disability discrimination and hostile work environment claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act because she failed to plead facts demonstrating legal disability or a hostile work environment based on disability. However, the court reversed and remanded the retaliation claim, finding that plaintiff alleged sufficient facts establishing the elements of retaliation under the Act based on her complaints of disability discrimination.
Karla K. Allsberry, Appellant, vs. Patrick S. Flynn, et al., Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 23, 2025#ED113270
Connie Haworth vs. Guest Services, Inc., et al.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictNovember 25, 2025#WD87623
Victoria Amrine vs. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Employer, and Division of Employment Security(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictNovember 25, 2025#WD88066
Phillip Weeks, Appellant, vs. City of St. Louis, Respondent.(2025)
Supreme Court of MissouriNovember 4, 2025#SC101018