Empire Bank, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bruce McRobert, Defendant-Appellant, and McRobert and Miller Accounting Consultants, Inc., Defendant.
Decision date: Unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Case Style: Empire Bank, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bruce McRobert, Defendant-Appellant, and McRobert and Miller Accounting Consultants, Inc., Defendant. Case Number: 28642 Handdown Date: 03/18/2008 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Greene County, Hon. Jason R. Brown Counsel for Appellant: Robert Dean McGee Counsel for Respondent: Jeffrey Carl Goodnight Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: REVERSED AND REMANDED. Barney, P.J., Lynch, C.J., Rahmeyer and Burrell, JJ., concur. Opinion: Appellant, Bruce McRobert, appeals from a judgment of the Associate Division of the Circuit Court of Greene County, in which the court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Empire Bank, and against the Defendants, Bruce McRobert and McRobert and Miller Accounting Consultants, Inc., jointly and severally, on Empire Bank's claims for unpaid rent, common area maintenance charges, and attorney fees. We reverse and remand for a new trial. After filing the notice of appeal in this case, Appellant's counsel requested the preparation of a transcript of the trial for the record on appeal. In response, the trial court advised Appellant's counsel that, "due to mechanical failure" of the sound recording equipment, no trial transcript could be prepared. Appellant has filed a motion in this Court asking that the case be remanded to the trial court for a new trial due to the fact that a transcript cannot be produced. Appellant has also presented this Court with several documents, including the trial court's docket sheet and a statement from the Central
Transcribing Supervisor for the Office of State Courts Administrator, all reflecting that a transcript cannot be prepared in this case. Empire Bank has not responded to Appellant's motion to remand. As applicable here, Rule 81.12(a), Missouri Court Rules (2007), provides that "[t]he record on appeal shall contain all of the record, proceedings and evidence necessary to the determination of all questions to be presented . . . to the appellate court for decision." However, "[t]he appropriate remedy when 'the record on appeal is inadequate through no fault of the parties' is to reverse and remand the case to the trial court." Goodman v. Goodman, 165 S.W.3d 499, 501-02 (Mo.App. 2005) (quoting Oyler v. Director of Revenue, 10 S.W.3d 226, 228 (Mo.App. 2000)); see also C.H.M. v. Greene County Juvenile Office, 158 S.W.3d 878, 879 (Mo.App. 2005); Jackson v. Director of Revenue, 60 S.W.3d 707, 708 (Mo.App. 2001). Here, it is through no fault or negligence of Appellant that a transcript cannot be prepared. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for a new trial. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
AIG Agency, Inc., d/b/a Associated Insurance Group, Appellant, vs. Missouri General Insurance Agency, Inc., Jim Baxendale and Mitch O'Brien, Respondents.(2015)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictNovember 3, 3015#ED102096
Christopher Hanshaw, Appellant, vs. Crown Equipment Corp., et al., Respondents.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101091
The court affirmed the circuit court's decision to exclude Hanshaw's expert witness testimony and grant summary judgment to Crown Equipment in a product liability case involving an allegedly defectively designed forklift. The expert's opinions were properly excluded because they were not supported by reliable methodology, as the expert performed no tests and failed to demonstrate how cited research and data supported his conclusions.
Mouna Apperson, f/k/a Nicholas Apperson, Appellant, vs. Natasha Kaminsky, et al., Respondents.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101020
The court affirmed the directed verdict as to four counts against Norman based on agency but vacated and remanded the defamation counts against Kaminsky and one count against Norman, finding that the circuit court erred in requiring independent evidence of reputational damage beyond the plaintiff's own testimony when the evidence of harm was substantial and directly resulted from the defendants' statements.
K.A.C. by and through, ASHLEY ACOSTA, NEXT FRIEND, and MICHAEL CRITES, JR., Appellants v. MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, ET AL., Respondents(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictJanuary 12, 2026#SD38943
Appellants sought damages for a wrongful death resulting from a motor vehicle collision involving a pursued driver, alleging the Missouri State Highway Patrol's pursuit was negligent and proximately caused the collision. The court affirmed summary judgment for MSHP, finding that Appellants failed to produce sufficient facts demonstrating that MSHP's actions were the proximate cause of the collision, which is a necessary element of their case.
Mark and Sherry Davis, and David and Denise Kamm; Kevin Laughlin vs. City of Kearney, Missouri(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictDecember 16, 2025#WD87389