Empire Bank, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bruce McRobert, Defendant-Appellant, and McRobert and Miller Accounting Consultants, Inc., Defendant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Bruce McRobert, Defendant-·Bruce McRobert, Defendant-Appellant, and McRobert and Miller Accounting Consultants, Inc.
- Respondent
- Empire Bank, Plaintiff-
Disposition
Mixed outcome
- {"type":"reversed","scope":null}
- {"type":"remanded","scope":null}
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Case Style: Empire Bank, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bruce McRobert, Defendant-Appellant, and McRobert and Miller Accounting Consultants, Inc., Defendant. Case Number: 28642 Handdown Date: 03/18/2008 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Greene County, Hon. Jason R. Brown Counsel for Appellant: Robert Dean McGee Counsel for Respondent: Jeffrey Carl Goodnight Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: REVERSED AND REMANDED. Barney, P.J., Lynch, C.J., Rahmeyer and Burrell, JJ., concur. Opinion: Appellant, Bruce McRobert, appeals from a judgment of the Associate Division of the Circuit Court of Greene County, in which the court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Empire Bank, and against the Defendants, Bruce McRobert and McRobert and Miller Accounting Consultants, Inc., jointly and severally, on Empire Bank's claims for unpaid rent, common area maintenance charges, and attorney fees. We reverse and remand for a new trial. After filing the notice of appeal in this case, Appellant's counsel requested the preparation of a transcript of the trial for the record on appeal. In response, the trial court advised Appellant's counsel that, "due to mechanical failure" of the sound recording equipment, no trial transcript could be prepared. Appellant has filed a motion in this Court asking that the case be remanded to the trial court for a new trial due to the fact that a transcript cannot be produced. Appellant has also presented this Court with several documents, including the trial court's docket sheet and a statement from the Central
Transcribing Supervisor for the Office of State Courts Administrator, all reflecting that a transcript cannot be prepared in this case. Empire Bank has not responded to Appellant's motion to remand. As applicable here, Rule 81.12(a), Missouri Court Rules (2007), provides that "[t]he record on appeal shall contain all of the record, proceedings and evidence necessary to the determination of all questions to be presented . . . to the appellate court for decision." However, "[t]he appropriate remedy when 'the record on appeal is inadequate through no fault of the parties' is to reverse and remand the case to the trial court." Goodman v. Goodman, 165 S.W.3d 499, 501-02 (Mo.App. 2005) (quoting Oyler v. Director of Revenue, 10 S.W.3d 226, 228 (Mo.App. 2000)); see also C.H.M. v. Greene County Juvenile Office, 158 S.W.3d 878, 879 (Mo.App. 2005); Jackson v. Director of Revenue, 60 S.W.3d 707, 708 (Mo.App. 2001). Here, it is through no fault or negligence of Appellant that a transcript cannot be prepared. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for a new trial. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Rules
- Rule 81.12cited
Rule 81.12
Cases
- goodman v goodman 165 sw3d 499cited
Goodman v. Goodman, 165 S.W.3d 499
- jackson v director of revenue 60 sw3d 707cited
Jackson v. Director of Revenue, 60 S.W.3d 707
- oyler v director of revenue 10 sw3d 226cited
Oyler v. Director of Revenue, 10 S.W.3d 226
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
IN THE INTEREST OF: J.M.H. and A.M.E.H., Minors R.J.L. AND T.N.L., Petitioners/Respondents, vs. G.M.H., Respondent, and J.D.H., Respondent/Appellant.(2017)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictApril 6, 2017#SD34636
John Gregory Lyytinen, Appellant v. Lauri Jean Lyytinen, Respondent(2008)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District
IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.M.M. Minor GREENE COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, Respondent vs. C.M.M., Appellant(2022)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictJune 7, 2022#SD37486
BRIAUNA RAEANNA COLLINS, Respondent vs. DAVID JOE BANNISTER, JR., Appellant(2022)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictMay 6, 2022#SD37464
IN THE INTEREST OF: C.J.D., R.M.D., and I.S.D., Minors E.J.D. and R.H.D., Appellants, v. GREENE COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, Respondent.(2016)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District#SD34143