George Lee Vernor, Appellant, v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: George Lee Vernor, Appellant, v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, Respondent. Case Number: No. 54042 Handdown Date: 08/19/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Cole County, Hon. Thomas J. Brown, III Counsel for Appellant: George Lee Vernor, pro se Counsel for Respondent: Stephen D. Hawke Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Smart, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER George Lee Vernor filed a Petition for Declaratory Judgment alleging that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole erred in failing to afford him a preliminary hearing before extending his conditional release date by 354 days. He appeals the trial court's dismissal of the Petition as moot, claiming that the court below should have reached the merits of his Petition. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and agree that the trial court properly dismissed the Petition as moot. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm dismissal of his Petition by this summary order, but have provided the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450