OTT LAW

Henry Buford, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Henry Buford, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 70902 Handdown Date: 06/27/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ. Opinion:

ORDER Appellant, Henry Buford, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, explaining the reasons for our decision, is attached solely for the use of the parties involved. Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions