OTT LAW

In the Interest of K.T., J.T., and A.T.

Decision date: Unknown

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: In the Interest of K.T., J.T., and A.T. Case Number: 73046 and 73130 Handdown Date: 07/21/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Lincoln County, Hon. J. Rockne Calhoun Counsel for Appellant: Edward J. Grewach and Thomas B. Burkemper Counsel for Respondent: G. John Richards Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall and Rhodes Russell, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Mother and father appeal from the trial court's judgment terminating their parental rights to K.T., J.T., and A.T. We find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions