St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

murphy v carron 536 sw2d 30

This authority appears in 2,414 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:murphy-v-carron-536-sw2d-30
Citation Sample
Murphy v. Carron , 536 S.W.2d 30
Cases Shown
50
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationCorporate LawReal EstateFamily LawCriminal LawEmployment Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to murphy v carron 536 sw2d 30?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

2,373

followed

40

distinguished

1

Cases Citing murphy v carron 536 sw2d 30

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 24, 2026

In re the Marriage of: Stacey L. Noble vs. Bradford R. Noble

cited

Citation: Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30

Wife appealed the trial court's dissolution judgment, challenging the court's failure to provide a remedy after independent investigation of facts, the use of normalized income to determine husband's maintenance obligation, and the finding that husband lacked ability to pay maintenance. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment in all respects.

Family LawCivil Litigation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Feb 10, 2026

M.D.M, Appellant, v. A.W.S., Respondent.

cited

Citation: Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30

The court affirmed the circuit court's child custody and support judgment, rejecting Father's six points of error regarding the Form 14 calculations, denial of Line 11 credit despite equal visitation time, disproportionate attorney's and GAL fees, and exclusion of testimony on equitable abatement. The appellate court found that Father failed to meet the required analytical standards for challenging the judgment and that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in denying the Line 11 credit and ruling against equitable abatement.

Family LawCivil Litigation
cited

Citation: Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30

In this quiet title appeal, the court reversed the trial court's interpretation of an easement deed that the Daumes held over a private roadway. The court rejected the trial court's constructions that the easement's 'non-commercial purposes' limitation prohibited agricultural use and that it was restricted to the Daumes and their immediate family members.

Real EstateCorporate LawCivil Litigation
cited

Citation: Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30

Real EstateCorporate LawCivil Litigation