Jeff C. Tacina, Appellant, vs. Jo Ann Fabrics, Respondent.
Decision date: February 23, 2021ED108515
Opinion
JEFF C. TACINA, ) No. ED108515 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Charles County vs. ) ) Honorable Matthew E.P. Thornhill JO ANN FABRICS, ) ) Respondent. ) FILED: February 23, 2021
Jeff Tacina appeals the trial court's judgment following proceedings in small claims court. Because Tacina's notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal. Background On March 22, 2019, Tacina filed a petition in small claims court, alleging that Respondent owed him unpaid wages. On June 7, 2019, after hearing the evidence, the trial court ruled in favor of Respondent and dismissed Tacina's petition with prejudice. That same day, Tacina filed an application for trial de novo. On June 17, 2019, the trial court entered a judgment denying his application for trial de novo and dismissing the case with prejudice. More than five months later, on December 2, 2019, Tacina filed a notice of appeal.
2
Discussion "This Court only has jurisdiction if [the appellant] filed a timely notice of appeal." Walker v. Smallwood, 247 S.W.3d 24 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008). Under Rule 81.04(a), 1 "the notice of appeal must be filed no later than 10 days after the judgment becomes final." Redden v. Redden, 279 S.W.3d 240, 241 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009). A judgment "becomes final at the expiration of thirty days after its entry if no timely authorized after-trial motion is filed." Rule 81.05(a)(1). Here, because Tacina did not file an authorized after-trial motion, the judgment entered on June 17, 2019 became final on July 17, 2019. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was July 29, 2019, 2 but Tacina did not file his notice of appeal until December 2, 2019. This Court issued an order directing Tacina to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Tacina's response to the show cause order does not provide a basis recognized under Missouri law for excusing his untimely notice of appeal. Because Tacina's notice of appeal was untimely, we are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, we dismiss the appeal.
_______________________________ MICHAEL E. GARDNER, Judge
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., concurs. Philip M. Hess, J., concurs.
1 All rule references are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2019). 2 Because the deadline fell on a Saturday, the notice of appeal was due on the next business day. Rule 44.01(a).
Related Opinions
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450
Dana Jensen vs. Division of Employment Security(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictOctober 29, 2024#WD86895