Jeff C. Tacina, Appellant, vs. Jo Ann Fabrics, Respondent.
Decision date: February 23, 2021ED108515
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Jeff C. Tacina
- Respondent
- Jo Ann Fabrics
Judges
- Opinion Author
- MICHAEL E. GARDNER
- Concurring
- Philip M. Hess
- Trial Court Judge
- Matthew E
Disposition
Dismissed
Procedural posture: Appeal from judgment following small claims court proceedings
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
JEFF C. TACINA, ) No. ED108515 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Charles County vs. ) ) Honorable Matthew E.P. Thornhill JO ANN FABRICS, ) ) Respondent. ) FILED: February 23, 2021
Jeff Tacina appeals the trial court's judgment following proceedings in small claims court. Because Tacina's notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal. Background On March 22, 2019, Tacina filed a petition in small claims court, alleging that Respondent owed him unpaid wages. On June 7, 2019, after hearing the evidence, the trial court ruled in favor of Respondent and dismissed Tacina's petition with prejudice. That same day, Tacina filed an application for trial de novo. On June 17, 2019, the trial court entered a judgment denying his application for trial de novo and dismissing the case with prejudice. More than five months later, on December 2, 2019, Tacina filed a notice of appeal.
2
Discussion "This Court only has jurisdiction if [the appellant] filed a timely notice of appeal." Walker v. Smallwood, 247 S.W.3d 24 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008). Under Rule 81.04(a), 1 "the notice of appeal must be filed no later than 10 days after the judgment becomes final." Redden v. Redden, 279 S.W.3d 240, 241 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009). A judgment "becomes final at the expiration of thirty days after its entry if no timely authorized after-trial motion is filed." Rule 81.05(a)(1). Here, because Tacina did not file an authorized after-trial motion, the judgment entered on June 17, 2019 became final on July 17, 2019. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was July 29, 2019, 2 but Tacina did not file his notice of appeal until December 2, 2019. This Court issued an order directing Tacina to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Tacina's response to the show cause order does not provide a basis recognized under Missouri law for excusing his untimely notice of appeal. Because Tacina's notice of appeal was untimely, we are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, we dismiss the appeal.
_______________________________ MICHAEL E. GARDNER, Judge
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., concurs. Philip M. Hess, J., concurs.
1 All rule references are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2019). 2 Because the deadline fell on a Saturday, the notice of appeal was due on the next business day. Rule 44.01(a).
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Rules
- Rule 44.01cited
Rule 44.01
- Rule 81.04cited
Rule 81.04
- Rule 81.05cited
Rule 81.05
Cases
- redden v redden 279 sw3d 240cited
Redden v. Redden, 279 S.W.3d 240
- walker v smallwood 247 sw3d 24cited
Walker v. Smallwood, 247 S.W.3d 24
Holdings
Issue-specific holdings extracted from the court's opinion.
Issue: Whether an appellate court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal when the notice of appeal is filed untimely.
No, an appellate court only has jurisdiction if the appellant files a timely notice of appeal, and an untimely notice deprives the court of jurisdiction.
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
HOWARD ROBERTS, Movant-Respondent v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Appellant(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictAugust 29, 2025#SD38530
In the Interest of: P.D.E. vs. Juvenile Officer(2022)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictNovember 22, 2022#WD84899
Lamont Campbell, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2021)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMay 18, 2021#ED108624
Gary S. Heifetz, Jeffrey S. Gershman, Steven B. Spewak, Jean Maylack, Fallon Maylack, Steven M. Stone, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sidney L. Stone, and Sidney M. Stone, Respondents, vs. Apex Clayton, Inc., Appellant.(2018)
Supreme Court of MissouriJuly 17, 2018#SC96514
Leesa Wiseman vs. Missouri Department of Corrections(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District#WD86412
C.R.S., Respondent, vs. C.M.H., Appellant.(2017)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictOctober 24, 2017#ED105098