Judith A. Stewart, Claimant/Appellant, v. St. Anthony's Medical Center and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Decision date: UnknownED81644
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Judith A. Stewart, Claimant/Appellant, v. St. Anthony's Medical Center and Division of Employment Security, Respondents Case Number: ED81644 Handdown Date: 10/01/2002 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Judith A. Stewart Counsel for Respondent: Larry Ruhmann Opinion Summary: Judith Stewart appeals the decision of the labor and industrial relations commission. APPEAL DISMISSED. Division Five holds: Stewart's notice of appeal to this court was untimely because it was filed more than 20 days after the commission's decision became final. As a result, this court is without jurisdiction to review Stewart's appeal. Citation: Opinion Author: Lawrence E. Mooney, Chief Judge Opinion Vote: APPEAL DISMISSED. Crahan and R. Dowd, Jr., JJ., concur Opinion: Judith Stewart, the claimant, appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission regarding her claim for unemployment benefits. The Commission affirmed the decision of the Appeals Tribunal, which disqualified her from receiving unemployment benefits after concluding she had been discharged for misconduct connected with work. We conclude the claimant's notice of appeal to this court is untimely and dismiss the appeal. This court has a duty to determine its jurisdiction sua sponte. Reisinger v. Reisinger, 39 S.W.3d 80, 83 (Mo. App.
E.D. 2001). The right of appeal is purely statutory and where statutes do not give such a right, no appeal exists. Labrier v. Anheuser Ford, Inc., 621 S.W.2d 51, 53 (Mo. banc 1981). Under section 288.200.2, RSMo 2000, the Commission's decision is final ten days after the date of mailing of the decision to the parties. The notice of appeal to this court was due within twenty days after the decision of the Commission became final. Section 288.210, RSMo 2000. In the case at hand, the Secretary of the Commission mailed its decision to the claimant on July 12, 2002. The decision became final ten days later on July 22, 2002. The claimant's notice of appeal was due twenty days thereafter on Monday, August 12, 2002. Section 288.240, RSMo 2000. The claimant's notice of appeal filed on August 15, 2002 is untimely. Under section 288.210, the legislature provided no procedure to seek a special order to file a late notice of appeal. Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo. App. E.D. 2000). The procedures outlined for appeal by statute in unemployment security cases are mandatory and an untimely appeal divests this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the claimant's appeal. Burch Food Services, Inc. v. Missouri Div. of Employment Sec., 945 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997). The appeal is dismissed for lack of a timely notice of appeal. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450