OTT LAW

Labor and Industrial Commission, Division of Employment Security, Respondent, v. Richard P. Westerhold and H. Richard Westerhold, Copartners d/b/a DiMarco Contractors, Appellants.

Decision date: Unknown

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Labor and Industrial Commission, Division of Employment Security, Respondent, v. Richard P. Westerhold and H. Richard Westerhold, Copartners d/b/a DiMarco Contractors, Appellants. Case Number: 71607 Handdown Date: 11/11/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Mark D. Seigel Counsel for Appellant: Richard P. Westerhold, Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: Alan J. Downs Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J., Rhodes Russell, J., and Blackmar, Sr.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Employer appeals from the denial of its motion to quash the execution of a certificate of assessment of unpaid unemployment insurance contributions. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions