OTT LAW

Lloyd E. Whitt, Plaintiff/Appellant v. Cupples Products, H.H. Robertson Company, Defendant/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Lloyd E. Whitt, Plaintiff/Appellant v. Cupples Products, H.H. Robertson Company, Defendant/Respondent. Case Number: 73013 Handdown Date: 05/12/1998 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Harry J. Nichols Counsel for Respondent: Maureen L. Cary Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J. Opinion: ORDER This is a workers' compensation case. Employee obtained an award from employer and the Second Injury Fund for a 1991 injury. Thereafter, employee sought to reopen the award against employer based on a change of medical condition. The Commission found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction and affirmed the administrative law judge's decision dismissing for lack of jurisdiction. Employee appeals. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions