Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)
Decision date: UnknownSD38360
Disposition
Affirmed
Procedural posture: Appeals from judgments
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
January 30, 2025
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b).
- SD38360 KENNETH ROBERT DAVIS, Movant-Appellant
v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent
- SD38460 A.D., Appellant
v. A.J.P., Respondent
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 30.25 (b).
- SD38383 STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent
v. CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS RUSSELL, JR., Defendant-Appellant
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Rules
- Rule 30.25cited
RULE 30.25
- Rule 84.16cited
RULE 84.16
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District#SD38371
Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District#SD37964
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Gerald R. Nytes, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113261
Gerald Nytes appealed his conviction for violating a full order of protection, arguing the State failed to prove he had notice of the order as required by statute. The court affirmed, finding sufficient evidence of notice based on Nytes's presence at the contested order of protection hearing and his subsequent violation through phone calls made from jail to the protected party.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gerald Nytes, Appellant.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 15, 2025#ED112197