OTT LAW

Patricia Henke, Employee/Appellant, v. Interlock Pharmacy Systems, Inc., Employer/Respondent, and Continental Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Patricia Henke, Employee/Appellant, v. Interlock Pharmacy Systems, Inc., Employer/Respondent, and Continental Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent. Case Number: 72684 Handdown Date: 03/24/1998 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Andrew H. Marty Counsel for Respondent: Patrick S. Butler and Vicky L. Anthony Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion:

ORDER Claimant appeals from a workers' compensation award issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions