OTT LAW

Paula Spaulding, Appellant, v. Bruker Brown Architects, Inc., P.C. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Paula Spaulding, Appellant, v. Bruker Brown Architects, Inc., P.C. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. Case Number: No. 72358 Handdown Date: 08/26/1997 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Mathieu D. Bregande Counsel for Respondent: Larry R. Ruhmann Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Reinhard, P.J., Karohl and Dowd, JJ., concur. Opinion: DIVISION SIX O R D E R Employee appeals from the order of the Commission disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits under Section 288.040, RSMo 1994. Employee alleges that her voluntary separation was for good cause, as required by section 288.050.1, RSMo. 1994. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The order of the Commission is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions