Reginald Bullock, Defendant-Movant, v. State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Reginald Bullock, Defendant-Movant, v. State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent. Case Number: 72219 Handdown Date: 03/03/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Edward M. Peek Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: Reginald Bullock, Movant, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief on the grounds that the motion court erred in denying his request for an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.