Richard Hanna, Claimant-Respondent, v. McDonnell Douglas Aerospace, Employer-Appellant, and Industrial Indemnity, Insurer.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Richard Hanna, Claimant-Respondent, v. McDonnell Douglas Aerospace, Employer-Appellant, and Industrial Indemnity, Insurer. Case Number: 73120 Handdown Date: 05/26/1998 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: George T. Floros Counsel for Respondent: James J. Sievers Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr. and Karohl, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Employer appeals workers' compensation awards. The awards are supported by competent and substantial evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.