Ruth Floyd, Employee/Appellant, v. McMillan/McGraw-Hill, Employer/Respondent, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Ruth Floyd, Employee/Appellant, v. McMillan/McGraw-Hill, Employer/Respondent, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent. Case Number: 72284 Handdown Date: 12/16/1997 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Evan J. Beatty Counsel for Respondent: Jeffrey J. Estes Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr. and Karohl, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R The award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by substantial and competent evidence. An extended opinion would not have precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.