OTT LAW

Shirley Rahe, Claimant/Appellant, v. Schnuck Markets, Inc., Employer/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Shirley Rahe, Claimant/Appellant, v. Schnuck Markets, Inc., Employer/Respondent. Case Number: No. 71547 Handdown Date: 06/24/1997 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ. Opinion:

ORDER Shirley Rahe (Employee) appeals from the Final Award Denying Compensation of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). Employee alleges the Commission erred because its award is not supported by sufficient and competent evidence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions