St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent, v. Frank Hooper, Jr., Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent, v. Frank Hooper, Jr., Appellant. Case Number: ED81614 Handdown Date: 09/03/2002 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Celeste Endicott Counsel for Appellant: Party Acting Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: Luke E. Meiners Opinion Summary: Frank Hooper, Jr., appeals from the judgment convicting him of destruction of property. DISMISSED. Division Five holds: Hooper lacks a final, appealable judgment where the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation. Citation: Opinion Author: Lawrence E. Mooney, Chief Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Crahan and R. Dowd, Jr., JJ., concur. Opinion: Frank Hooper, Jr., appeals from the judgment convicting him of destruction of property. Because there is no final, appealable judgment, we dismiss the appeal. The appellant was found guilty of destruction of property by the St. Louis County Municipal Court. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed the appellant on probation for one year. The appellant has now filed his notice of appeal from this judgment. In prosecutions for ordinance violations, the rules of criminal procedure apply. St. Louis County v. Afshari, 978 S.W. 2d 27 (Mo. App. E.D. 1998). The right of appeal in criminal cases is limited by statute to final judgments. Section

547.070, RSMo 2000. In criminal cases, a judgment is final for purposes of appeal when the judgment and sentence are entered. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993). Where imposition of sentence is suspended, the judgment is not final and a defendant may not appeal it. State v. Lynch, 679 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo. banc 1984). Here, the court suspended imposition of the appellant's sentence. As a result, there is no final, appealable judgment. We have a duty to sua sponte determine whether we have jurisdiction and if we lack jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Fischer v. City of Washington, 55 S.W.3d 372, 377 (Mo. App. E.D. 2001). On the Court's own motion, the appellant's appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.