STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. CITY OF OSAGE BEACH, Relator v. THE HONORABLE AARON G. KOEPPEN, Respondent

Statutes

• RSMo § 88.667

  Section 88.667, RSMo

  cited

Rules

• Rule 55.27

  Rule 55.27

  cited

Cases

• city of st louis v state 682 sw3d 387

  City of St. Louis v. State, 682 S.W.3d 387

  cited
• cola co v nixon 249 sw3d 855

  Cola Co. v. Nixon, 249 S.W.3d 855

  cited
• ferguson v city of sunrise beach 710 sw3d 620

  Ferguson v. City of Sunrise Beach, 710 S.W.3d 620

  followed
• gross v parson 624 sw3d 877

  Gross v. Parson, 624 S.W.3d 877

  cited
• merrell v carter 518 sw3d 798

  Merrell v. Carter, 518 S.W.3d 798

  cited
• missouri constitution state ex rel bailey v sengheiser 692 sw3d 20

  Missouri Constitution. State ex rel. Bailey v. Sengheiser, 692 S.W.3d 20

  cited
• scotland v mo pub entity risk mgmt fund 537 sw3d 358

  Scotland v. Mo. Pub. Entity Risk Mgmt. Fund, 537 S.W.3d 358

  cited
• see forbes v allison 646 sw3d 733

  See Forbes v. Allison, 646 S.W.3d 733

  cited
• southers v city of farmington 263 sw3d 603

  Southers v. City of Farmington, 263 S.W.3d 603

  cited
• state ex rel henley v bickel 285 sw3d 327

  State ex rel. Henley v. Bickel, 285 S.W.3d 327

  cited
• state ex rel jones v eighmy 572 sw3d 503

  State ex rel. Jones v. Eighmy, 572 S.W.3d 503

  cited
• state ex rel twiehaus v adolf 706 sw2d 443

  State ex rel. Twiehaus v. Adolf, 706 S.W.2d 443

  cited

1. Issue: Whether inverse condemnation is the exclusive remedy for property damage claims, including those alleging negligence, nuisance, trespass, and ejectment, against a public entity with the power of eminent domain.

   Yes; inverse condemnation is the exclusive remedy for property damage caused by a public entity with eminent domain power, and common law tort claims are not actionable as a matter of law in such circumstances.

   Standard of review: de novo