State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antwain White, Defendant/Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Antwain White, Defendant/
- Respondent
- State of Missouri, Plaintiff/
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antwain White, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 71441 Handdown Date: 06/09/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. David Mason Counsel for Appellant: Gwenda Robinson Counsel for Respondent: Cheryl Caponegro Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes-Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Following trial, a jury convicted Defendant Antwain White of second degree murder in violation of section 565.021, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 1994. At sentencing, the trial court sentenced Defendant to two concurrent terms of thirteen years of imprisonment. On appeal, Defendant disputes the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for second degree murder. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could find Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion:
None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 565.021cited
section 565.021, RSMo
- RSMo § 571.015cited
section 571.015, RSMo
Rules
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
Cases
- defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt state v grim 854 sw2d 403cited
Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Levester Hawkins, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Demetrics McCauley, Defendant-Appellant.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Derek Holmes, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.(2002)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED79467
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Derrick Banks, Appellant. Derrick Banks, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael McNulty, Defendant-Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Defendant/Appellant. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District