OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antwain White, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Antwain White, Defendant/
Respondent
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antwain White, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 71441 Handdown Date: 06/09/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. David Mason Counsel for Appellant: Gwenda Robinson Counsel for Respondent: Cheryl Caponegro Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes-Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Following trial, a jury convicted Defendant Antwain White of second degree murder in violation of section 565.021, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 1994. At sentencing, the trial court sentenced Defendant to two concurrent terms of thirteen years of imprisonment. On appeal, Defendant disputes the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for second degree murder. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could find Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Cases

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.