OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Clarence Miller, Defendant/Appellant. Clarence Miller, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Clarence Miller, Defendant/Appellant. Clarence Miller, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Case Number: 69602 and 72234 Handdown Date: 02/03/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Steven H. Goldman Counsel for Appellant: Ellen H. Flottman Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and Karen L. Kramer Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant, Clarence Miller, appeals from the judgment entered upon the conviction by a jury of two counts of stealing, third offense, Sections 570.030 and 570.040, RSMo 1994. The court found Defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to fifteen years' imprisonment on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. Defendant also appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief because of Defendant's escape prior to sentencing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions