OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dominic Belford, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Dominic Belford, Defendant/
Respondent
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dominic Belford, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 71590 Handdown Date: 03/17/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Sherri Sullivan Counsel for Appellant: Deborah B. Wafer Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and Breck K. Burgess Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER A jury found defendant, Dominic Belford, guilty of murder in the second degree, in violation of Section 565.021 RSMo (1994); armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo (1994); and unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030 RSMo (1994). He was sentenced to consecutive terms of ten and three years imprisonment and fined $1,000.00. Defendant appeals from the second degree murder and armed criminal action convictions. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.