OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Carter, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Michael Carter, Defendant/
Respondent
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Carter, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 71911 Handdown Date: 06/09/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Bernhardt Drumm Counsel for Appellant: Paul Yarns Counsel for Respondent: John Morris, III, and Gregory Barnes Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Michael Carter(Defendant)appeals from judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of Burglary in the First Degree, in violation of Section 569.160, RSMo 1994; unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030, RSMo Supp. 1995; kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, RSMo 1994; armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, RSMo 1994; and endangering the welfare of a child, in violation of Section 568.050, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to serve concurrent terms of imprisonment for five years for Burglary in the First Degree and Unlawful Use of a Weapon; a concurrent ten-year term of imprisonment for Kidnapping; a concurrent seven-year term of imprisonment for Armed Criminal Action; and a consecutive one-year term of imprisonment and payment of a fine of $1,000 for Endangering the Welfare of a Child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The

judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.