State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Carter, Defendant/Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Michael Carter, Defendant/
- Respondent
- State of Missouri, Plaintiff/
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Carter, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 71911 Handdown Date: 06/09/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Bernhardt Drumm Counsel for Appellant: Paul Yarns Counsel for Respondent: John Morris, III, and Gregory Barnes Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Michael Carter(Defendant)appeals from judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of Burglary in the First Degree, in violation of Section 569.160, RSMo 1994; unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030, RSMo Supp. 1995; kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, RSMo 1994; armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, RSMo 1994; and endangering the welfare of a child, in violation of Section 568.050, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to serve concurrent terms of imprisonment for five years for Burglary in the First Degree and Unlawful Use of a Weapon; a concurrent ten-year term of imprisonment for Kidnapping; a concurrent seven-year term of imprisonment for Armed Criminal Action; and a consecutive one-year term of imprisonment and payment of a fine of $1,000 for Endangering the Welfare of a Child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The
judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 565.110cited
Section 565.110, RSMo
- RSMo § 568.050cited
Section 568.050, RSMo
- RSMo § 569.160cited
Section 569.160, RSMo
- RSMo § 571.015cited
Section 571.015, RSMo
- RSMo § 571.030cited
Section 571.030, RSMo
Rules
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tyrone Ford, Appellant.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Appellant, v. Stephen Jay Thorp, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John L. Sanders, Appellant(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Albert Welch, Appellant.(2020)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 11, 2020#ED106820
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, vs. Sean D. Hibler, Defendant/Appellant.(2013)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictNovember 26, 2013#ED99285
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Brian Daniels, Appellant.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District