OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John King, Appellant. John King, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
John King·John King, Appellant. John King, Appellant, v. State of Missouri
Respondent
State of Missouri

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John King, Appellant. John King, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 67485 and 71462 Handdown Date: 03/03/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Anna Forder Counsel for Appellant: Susan Eckles and Deborah B. Wafer Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and Meghan J. Stephens Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J., Teitelman, J. and Blackmar, Sr.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of two counts of first degree murder, in violation of section 565.020 RSMo. 1994, one count of first degree assault, in violation of section 565.050 RSMo. 1994, and three counts of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo. 1994. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.