OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Henry A. Jackson, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Henry A. Jackson, Defendant/
Respondent
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Henry A. Jackson, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 66414 and 71391 Handdown Date: 12/09/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. David C. Mason Counsel for Appellant: Ellen H. Flottman Counsel for Respondent: Daniel G. Cierpiot Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and James R. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Henry Jackson appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first degree murder, Section 565.020 RSMo 1994, one count of first degree assault, Section 565.050 RSMo 1994, and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 1994. Jackson was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole, fifteen years, and two life sentences to be served concurrently. Jackson also filed a Rule 29.15 motion which was denied on the merits after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court and the judgment of the motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.