OTT LAW

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent vs. JUSTIN P. GILLER, Appellant

Decision date: June 29, 2020SD35980

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD35980 ) JUSTIN P. GILLER, ) FILED: June 29, 2020 ) Appellant. )

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PHELPS COUNTY Honorable John D. Beger, Judge AFFIRMED Justin Giller appeals a felony conviction, challenging only the persistent- offender finding on a theory that Case.net proof of prior convictions 1 cannot be

1 See www.courts.mo.gov/casenet, which Giller accurately describes as "the electronic, automated case management system for Missouri courts." The colloquy quoted by Giller follows: [PROSECUTOR]: Judge. We're asking for the Court to take judicial notice of the first two cases, 14TE-CR00675 [and]... THE COURT: 14TE-CR-- go ahead. [PROSECUTOR]: 00675-01. THE COURT: Case.net indicates the Defendant in that case was Justin P. Giller, date of birth 9/11 of '91 and that he entered an Alford plea on April 14 of 2015 to the Class C, under the prior criminal code, the felony of burglary in the second degree and was sentenced to two years in the Department of Corrections. [PROSECUTOR]: Is there -- I'm sorry, Judge. Is there an offense date in the documents?

2

judicially noticed unless it is "presented either through the testimony of a sworn witness or through properly authenticated physical printouts." He did not raise this objection at trial, now claims plain error, but shows no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice. Rather, Giller: • acknowledges RSMo § 490.130, under which court records in a statewide court automated recordkeeping system established by our supreme court are admissible in our courts without further certification; 2

• does not dispute that § 490.130 covers Case.net records; and • does not deny his prior convictions or that Case.net shows them. Point denied. Judgment affirmed. DANIEL E. SCOTT, P.J. – OPINION AUTHOR DON E. BURRELL, J. – CONCURS MARY W. SHEFFIELD, J. – CONCURS

THE COURT: One moment. The information indicates that it occurred on or about October 20 of 2014. [PROSECUTOR]: Thank you, Your Honor... THE COURT: All right. And your next case? [PROSECUTOR]: Your Honor, the next case number is 14TE-CR00790. And, Your Honor, we would -- THE COURT: In that case the Defendant is Justin P. Giller, date of birth 9/11 of '91, and it alleges or shows that he entered a -- an Alford plea to burglary in the second degree again on April 14 of 2015. I think both of those were before me. And the date of occurrence is alleged to have been October 16 of 2014. [PROSECUTOR]: Thank you, Your Honor. Based on those records, the State would ask for the Court the find that the Defendant is beyond a reasonable doubt a prior and persistent felony offender. 2 To the extent the trial judge read e-filed or digitized Case.net documents, as the quoted colloquy suggests, he was reading official court records. Rule 103.03; State v. Ralph, 521 S.W.3d 673, 679 n.7 (Mo.App. 2017).

Related Opinions

Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987

affirmed
criminal-lawmajority4,922 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080

affirmed

McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.

criminal-lawper_curiam3,374 words

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782

affirmed

The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.

criminal-lawper_curiam1,516 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218

remanded

James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.

criminal-lawper_curiam3,993 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Deandre D. Walton, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED112976

affirmed

Appellant Deandre Walton appealed his convictions for two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of armed criminal action, and unlawful possession of a firearm, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements and admitting evidence of his statements at trial. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, finding no error in the trial court's denial of the suppression motion.

criminal-lawper_curiam1,670 words