State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Khelby Calmese, Appellant; Khelby Calmese, Appellant, v. State of Missouri.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Khelby Calmese·Khelby Calmese, Appellant; Khelby Calmese, Appellant, v. State of Missouri.
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Syllabus
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Khelby Calmese, Appellant; Khelby Calmese, Appellant, v. State of Missouri. Case Number: Nos. 69218 and 71443 Handdown Date: 05/20/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Thomas C. Grady Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Opinion:
Before Lawrence G. Crahan, P.J., Stanley A. Grimm, J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
PER CURIAM
ORDER Defendant appeals following his conviction by a jury of second degree murder in violation of section 565.021 RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment. Defendant asserts error in the trial court's refusal to instruct on the lesser included offense of involuntary manslaughter, the exclusion of certain testimony, and various rulings concerning the scope of closing arguments. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant's claims of error are without merit. We further find that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 565.021cited
section 565.021 RSMo
Rules
- Rule 29.15cited
Rule 29.15
- Rule 84.16cited
Rule 84.16
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Julian McClain, Defendant/Appellant. Julian McClain, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Derek Holmes, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.(2002)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED79467
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Derrick Banks, Appellant. Derrick Banks, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Defendant/Appellant. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerome Eiland, Defendant/Appellant. Jerome Eiland, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District