OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Defendant/Appellant. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Defendant/·Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Defendant/Appellant. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Movant, v. State of Missouri
Respondent
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Defendant/Appellant. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: Nos. 69541 & 71833 Handdown Date: 09/02/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Steven Goldman Counsel for Appellant: Emmett D. Queener Counsel for Respondent: Meghan J. Stephens Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, JJ., concur. Opinion:

O R D E R Defendant Exzanthanese N. Roberts appeals his conviction for murder in the second degree, Section 565.021 RSMo 1994 and armed criminal action in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to twenty- five years and five years, respectively, to run concurrently. In this consolidated appeal defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, without an evidentiary hearing. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.