OTT LAW

Susan Kummer, Claimant/Appellant, v. St. Louis Community College, Employer/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Susan Kummer, Claimant/Appellant, v. St. Louis Community College, Employer/Respondent. Case Number: 72842 Handdown Date: 03/17/1998 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Marc S. Wallis Counsel for Respondent: Raymond J. Flunker Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: Claimant appeals the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) modifying the award of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The ALJ calculated the rate of compensation pursuant to section 287.250.3, RSMo 1994, and the Commission reversed the ALJ's calculation and awarded compensation pursuant to section 287.250.1(4). The Commission's order modifying compensation is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions