The Chase Manhattan Bank, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William O. Schweitzer.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: The Chase Manhattan Bank, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William O. Schweitzer. Case Number: No. 69930 Handdown Date: 05/20/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Patrick Flynn Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam. Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Opinion: Modified from Order filed: 2/11/97

Before Kathianne Knaup Crane, P.J., Gerald M. Smith and James A. Pudlowski, JJ. ORDER Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in a court-tried case in plaintiff's favor in an action to recover the unpaid balance on two credit card accounts. We affirm. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.