Thomas J. Haag, Appellant, v. Director of Revenue, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Thomas J. Haag, Appellant, v. Director of Revenue, Respondent. Case Number: 54372 Handdown Date: 06/30/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Alan Slayton Counsel for Appellant: Michael C. McIntosh Counsel for Respondent: Evan J. Buchheim Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Breckenridge, P.J., Spinden and Riederer, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Thomas Haag appeals from the trial court's order affirming the Director of Revenue's revocation of his driving privileges for refusal to submit to chemical testing pursuant to Section 577.041, RSMo 1994. On appeal, Mr. Haag contends that the trial court erred by affirming the revocation of his driving privileges because the trial court's decision was against the weight of the evidence since the arresting officer lacked probable cause to arrest him for driving while intoxicated. The trial court's decision that the arresting officer had probable cause to believe Mr. Haag drove while intoxicated is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.