Victor Labantschnig, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc., and J.W. Ackerman, Defendants-Respondents.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Victor Labantschnig, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc., and J.W. Ackerman, Defendants-Respondents. Case Number: No. 71030 Handdown Date: 05/27/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. James R. Hartenbach Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam. Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Opinion:

Before Lawrence G. Crahan, P.J. and Stanley A. Grimm, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J. O R D E R

Victor Labantschnig appeals from a judgment dismissing his libel and invasion of privacy claims against Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc. and J.W. Ackerman (both referred to as respondents) upon the granting of respondents' motion to dismiss. That judgment resolved all of Labantschnig's claims against respondents.(FN1) No error of law appears in the judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes:

1. After the trial court entered judgment on Labantschnig's claims

against respondents, the only remaining defendant, Earle J. Niederluecke, filed a motion for clarification and to dismiss. In December 1996, the trial judge granted that motion and clarified the earlier dismissal applied to all parties "such that the entire case is final for appeal purposes." Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.