OTT LAW

Victor Martin, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: UnknownSC82703

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Victor Martin
Respondent
State of Missouri

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion

Case Style: Victor Martin, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: SC82703 Handdown Date: 01/23/2001 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. William F. Mauer Counsel for Appellant: Lew Kollias and Rosemary E. Percival Counsel for Respondent: Karen L. Kramer Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Opinion: Victor Martin was charged as a prior and persistent offender with the class A felony of robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, RSMo 1994. He pleaded guilty to the charge of robbery in the first degree and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Martin filed a motion to vacate sentence and judgment under Rule 24.035, which was overruled by the trial court. Martin appeals. Martin claims that the motion court clearly erred in finding that his decision to enter a plea of guilty was voluntary, knowing and intelligent, because the evidence at the hearing showed that plea counsel caused him to believe that he was entering a plea of guilty to robbery in the second degree in exchange for a sentence of five years. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.