OTT LAW

Donnie Holmes, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Donnie Holmes
Respondent
State of Missouri

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Donnie Holmes, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 73371 Handdown Date: 07/28/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Julian Bush Counsel for Appellant: Dave Hemingway and Jane Berman Counsel for Respondent: Meghan J. Stephens Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. J. Dowd, P.J., Crahan and Teitelman, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Movant Donnie Holmes pled guilty to first degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 1994 and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 1994. Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.