William H. Stallings, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. The Pride Organization, Inc., et al., Defendants/Appellants.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: William H. Stallings, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. The Pride Organization, Inc., et al., Defendants/Appellants. Case Number: 72407 Handdown Date: 03/31/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Stephen Goldman Counsel for Appellant: Joe A. Johnson Counsel for Respondent: Eugene Portman and Wrenn Terrill Kates Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Russell and J. Dowd, J.J. concur. Opinion: ORDER Respondent filed a suit to compel specific performance of a promissory note. Appellants raised fraud in the procurement as an affirmative defense. Respondent filed a motion for summary judgment which the trial court granted. Appellants appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.