Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

William Smith, Jr., Appellant, v. Director of Revenue, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: William Smith, Jr., Appellant, v. Director of Revenue, Respondent. Case Number: 53836 Handdown Date: 12/23/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Atchison County, Hon. Wiliam Rex Beavers Counsel for Appellant: Jefferson G. Broady Counsel for Respondent: James A. Chenault, III Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Smart, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, J. J., concur. Opinion: ORDER William Smith, Jr. appeals from the judgment of the circuit court sustaining the revocation of his driving privileges. He argues that the sheriff did not have probable cause to arrest him at the time he asked Mr. Smith to exit his vehicle. Finding no miscarriage of justice or manifest injustice, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion