OTT LAW

William Wagner, Employee/Appellant, v. William Wagner, Employee/Respondent and Commercial Union Insurance, Insurer/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: William Wagner, Employee/Appellant, v. William Wagner, Employee/Respondent and Commercial Union Insurance, Insurer/Respondent. Case Number: 73738 Handdown Date: 09/15/1998 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: James F. McCartney Counsel for Respondent: Susan M. Kelly Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Hoff, P.J., Gaertner and Rhodes Russell, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Opinion modified by Court's own motion on October 20, 1998. This substitution does not constitute a new opinion. In this workers' compensation case, William Wagner (Employee) appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), which awarded Employee permanent partial disability of 20 percent of the right wrist. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's award is supported by competent and substantial evidence and further, is not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Davis v. Research Medical Center, 903 S.W.2d 557, 565 (Mo. App. 1995). An extended opinion would have no

precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions