Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Anthony Tate Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
anthony-tate
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving Anthony Tate

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Anthony Tate appealed his convictions for two counts of first-degree assault, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and alleging plain error by the circuit court. Tate contended the court erred by not issuing a corrective instruction regarding the State's closing argument and by not striking portions of a witness's testimony as inadmissible hearsay. The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed the circuit court's judgment, finding sufficient evidence to support the assault convictions and no plain error in the unpreserved claims.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / May 28, 2024

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Anthony Tate, Appellant.

Appellant

Anthony Tate appealed his jury convictions for first-degree murder, assault, and weapon charges stemming from a drive-by shooting. The appellate court granted Points One and Two, finding the State failed to present sufficient evidence that two victims suffered "serious physical injury" to support class A felony first-degree assault convictions. The court denied Tate's plain error claims in Points Three and Four, concluding he did not demonstrate manifest injustice regarding the State's acquittal-first closing argument or a detective's alleged hearsay testimony. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment in part, reversed the class A felony assault convictions, entered class B felony assault convictions, and remanded for resentencing.