Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Ray James Juniel Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
ray-james-juniel
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Ray James Juniel

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 13, 2019

State of Missouri vs. Ray James Juniel

Respondent

Ray James Juniel appealed his convictions for statutory rape, statutory sodomy, and endangering the welfare of a child, arguing that the trial court violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The delay between his initial indictment and trial was 866 days. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, concluding that despite the presumptively prejudicial delay, the balance of the Barker factors did not establish a speedy trial violation, as much of the delay was attributable to Juniel or neutral reasons, and actual prejudice was minimal.